Andy Lutomirski posted on Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:11:44 -0800 as excerpted:
(This is Fedora's kernel 3.11.6-200.fc19.x86_64)
I have a file on my btrfs filesystem. Reading it results in:
[ 170.261789] general protection fault: [#1] SMP
I had a similar case recently (running 3.12-rc5+ at
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:34:20PM +0100, Valentina Giusti wrote:
With this patchset I removed the unused variables found with
make W=1 fs/btrfs/
Valentina Giusti (9):
btrfs: remove unused variable from btrfs_search_forward
btrfs: remove unused variable from btrfs_new_inode
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:38PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
Fixed three coding style issues. Replaced spaces with tabs.
Signed-off-by: Aldo Iljazi m...@aldo.io
---
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:38PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
Fixed three coding style issues. Replaced spaces with tabs.
Signed-off-by: Aldo Iljazi m...@aldo.io
---
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:32:37PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:38PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
Fixed three coding style issues. Replaced spaces with tabs.
Signed-off-by: Aldo Iljazi m...@aldo.io
---
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 6
David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:32:37PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:38PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
Fixed three coding style issues. Replaced spaces with tabs.
Signed-off-by: Aldo Iljazi m...@aldo.io
---
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:15:57AM +0100, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
As you were in the process of a rebalance these errors may actually be
caused by this serious bug Btrfs: relocate csums properly with
prealloc extents.
I hit that myself with several preallocated files made by rtorrent
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:40:16PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
I replaced the spaces with tabs, as the kernel coding style suggests.
I repeat:
Whitespace changes are just noise, we don't need them at this point of
development phase of btrfs.
david
Okay then ignore the patch.
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:13:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
Would be nice to say why it's safe to remove the barrier. The percpu
counters do not need it, they use a spinlock. The barrier was there due
to access
Hello!
I have a serious problem with inaccessible data and segfaulting btrfsck
for the /var partition on my computer.
The reason is not entirely clear to me. The only extraordinary things
happening today were an empty CMOS battery and me accidentally enabling
C1E support when reconfiguring the
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Hans-Kristian Bakke hkba...@gmail.com wrote:
As you were in the process of a rebalance these errors may actually be
caused by this serious bug Btrfs: relocate csums properly with
prealloc extents.
I hit that myself with several preallocated files made by rtorrent
during
David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:40:16PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
I replaced the spaces with tabs, as the kernel coding style suggests.
I repeat:
Whitespace changes are just noise, we don't need them at this point of
development phase of btrfs.
david
I gave up on getting the filesystem to a concistent state, but my
corruption was much more severe than yours. Several 100 000's. As the
fs was still usable and mountable I just moved all the files to
another filesystem, patched the kernel recreated the original btrfs fs
and ran a rebalance. This
Hello,
More than 12 hours ago, I tried to umount a btrfs filesystem. Something
involving btrfs-cleaner and btrfs-transacti is still running, but I
don't know what.
I have noticed excessively long umount times before, and it is a
significant concern for me.
A bit of background:
The filesystem
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:36:24PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when
we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in
generic_make_request() (or bio_add_page() originally)
Signed-off-by: Kent
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:36:19PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
With immutable biovecs we don't want code accessing bi_io_vec directly -
the uses this patch changes weren't incorrect since they all own the
bio, but it makes the code harder to audit for no good reason - also,
this will help
Dennis Schridde posted on Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:04:59 +0100 as excerpted:
I have a serious problem with inaccessible data and segfaulting btrfsck
for the /var partition on my computer.
I can mount it[.] When I access certain directories, however, I get a
message like this one:
ls: cannot
John Goerzen posted on Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:42:02 -0600 as excerpted:
Hello,
More than 12 hours ago, I tried to umount a btrfs filesystem. Something
involving btrfs-cleaner and btrfs-transacti is still running, but I
don't know what.
I have noticed excessively long umount times before,
On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
I presume that my filesystem is still corrupt.
I'm the original reporter of the bug. The file system itself isn't corrupt, but
the affected files probably are. In my case, systemd journal files were
reported as corrupt by
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:26:54AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
I presume that my filesystem is still corrupt.
I'm the original reporter of the bug. The file system itself isn't corrupt,
but the affected files
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
John Goerzen posted on Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:42:02 -0600 as excerpted:
The filesystem in question involves two 2TB USB hard drives. It is 49%
full. Data is RAID0, metadata is RAID1. The files stored on it are for
BackupPC, meaning there are many,
We can just return false for this so we stop doing the snapshot aware defrag
stuff. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index f167ced..aa67387 100644
John Goerzen posted on Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:11:56 + as excerpted:
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
John Goerzen posted on Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:42:02 -0600 as excerpted:
The filesystem in question involves two 2TB USB hard drives. It is
49% full. Data is RAID0, metadata is
More than 12 hours ago, I tried to umount a btrfs filesystem.
Something involving btrfs-cleaner and btrfs-transacti is still
running, but I don't know what.
Does iostat -x 1 or iostat -k 1 show any disk activity?
Anything interesting in dmesg?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To
On 11/05/2013 12:46 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
More than 12 hours ago, I tried to umount a btrfs filesystem.
Something involving btrfs-cleaner and btrfs-transacti is still
running, but I don't know what.
Does iostat -x 1 or iostat -k 1 show any disk activity?
Yes. For instance, from
Hello Marc and all,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:51:11PM -0800 Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 12:50PM +0100, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 21:05 David Madden wrote:
I'd like to use BTRFS to do something like the old NetApp
snapshot system: every hour
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:26:54AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
I presume that my filesystem is still corrupt.
I'm the original reporter of the bug. The
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:45:16 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:13:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
Would be nice to say why it's safe to remove the barrier. The percpu
counters do not need
I have a system running the Debian package of 3.11.5 with an Amd Opteron 1212
processor (2*64bit cores), 8G of RAM, and an Intel 120G SSD for the root and
home subvols. It has a RAID-1 array of 2*3TB disks for bulk storage (movies
etc) but that probably isn't relevant to this problem.
On the
After a hard shutdown (by holding down the power button), mount (ro,
ro,recovery, and recovery) fails with some error output.
Further, btrfs-image (v0.20-rc1-358-g194aa4a) produces an empty output file.
---
root@sysresccd /mnt/backup/g/btrfs-progs % ./btrfs-image
/dev/mapper/nb205--ssd-main
We use set_bit() to assign ordered extent's flags, but in the related
tracepoint we don't do the same thing, which makes the trace output
not to parse flags correctly.
Also, since the flags are bits stuff, we change to use __print_flags with
a 'delim' instead of __print_symbolic.
Signed-off-by:
Flag BTRFS_ORDERED_TRUNCATED is a new one, update the tracepoint to
support it.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
include/trace/events/btrfs.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/btrfs.h b/include/trace/events/btrfs.h
index
- The variant nr_pages is assigned before we use it, so the initialization
at the beginning is unnecessary.
- If we enter the branch of the first if statement, the initialization of
the variant loops is also unnecessary.
- The memory barriers here are misused, the barrier is used to prevent
Hello,
sorry, I was totally unaware still being on 3.11rc2.
I re-ran btrfsck with the same result:
./btrfs-progs/btrfsck /dev/sdc1
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc1
UUID: 989306aa-d291-4752-8477-0baf94f8c42f
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
root 256 inode 9579 errors
34 matches
Mail list logo
