Re: Btrfs-progs static compile failure due to multiple uuid-tree.o in linking paratemeters

2013-11-11 Thread Stefan Behrens
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:22:01 +0200, Emil Karlson wrote: Greetings Btrfs-progs static compile fails due to multiple uuid-tree.o in linking paratemeters: build error: gcc -g -O1 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -o btrfs.static btrfs.static.o help.static.o cmds-subvolume.static.o

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: remove extra uuid-tree.o in objects

2013-11-11 Thread jkarlson
This fixes static compile target of btrfs-progs. Signed-off-by: Emil Karlson jekarl...@gmail.com --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 4e33648..4604b1f 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ CFLAGS = -g -O1

[PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: remove extra uuid-tree.o in objects

2013-11-11 Thread Emil Karlson
This fixes static compile target of btrfs-progs. Signed-off-by: Emil Karlson jekarl...@gmail.com --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 4e33648..4604b1f 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ CFLAGS = -g -O1

Re: btrfsck errors is it save to fix?

2013-11-11 Thread Hendrik Friedel
Hello, I re-post this: To answer the is it safe to fix question... In that context, yes, it's safe to btrfsck --repair, because you're prepared to lose the entire filesystem if worse comes to worse in any case, so even if btrfsck --repair makes things worse instead of better, you've not

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: allow --init-extent-tree to work when extent tree is borked

2013-11-11 Thread Martin
On 07/11/13 01:25, Martin wrote: On 28/10/13 15:11, Josef Bacik wrote: Ok I've sent [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: rework open_ctree to take flags, add a new one which should address your situation. Thanks, Josef, Tried your patch: Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com

Re: btrfsck errors is it save to fix?

2013-11-11 Thread Kai Krakow
Hendrik Friedel hend...@friedels.name schrieb: I re-post this: [...] root 256 inode 9579 errors 100 root 256 inode 9580 errors 100 root 256 inode 14258 errors 100 root 256 inode 14259 errors 100 root inode 9579 errors 100 root inode 9580 errors 100 root inode 14258 errors

Re: btrfsck errors is it save to fix?

2013-11-11 Thread Duncan
Kai Krakow posted on Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:58:59 +0100 as excerpted: Hendrik Friedel hend...@friedels.name schrieb: I re-post this: [...] root 256 inode 9579 errors 100 root 256 inode 9580 errors 100 root 256 inode 14258 errors 100 root 256 inode 14259 errors 100 root inode 9579

invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP

2013-11-11 Thread Franziska Näpelt
Hi everyone, we are using a btrfs RAID 1 with four 2TB hard drives (WD Caviar green) on a Debian 7.2 with Kernel 3.11.6 Now we had an 'invalid opcode: [#1] SMP' when a sector fails in messages log. After that, access over smb and nfs wasn't possible. A restart solved the problem of