A different lockdep chain, from test btrfs/014:
[ 229.850151] ==
[ 229.850788] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 229.850788] 3.15.0-rc7-default+ #146 Tainted: GW
[ 229.850788]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/27/14, 7:26 AM, David Sterba wrote:
A different lockdep chain, from test btrfs/014:
Are you sure this one was with the new patch? We shouldn't be holding
groups_sem anymore in btrfs_remove_block_group while performing the
kobject ops.
- -Jeff
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:14:11AM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/27/14, 7:26 AM, David Sterba wrote:
A different lockdep chain, from test btrfs/014:
Are you sure this one was with the new patch? We shouldn't be holding
groups_sem anymore
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
We were setting the BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag on the root of the
parent of our target snapshot, instead of setting it in the target
snapshot's root.
This is easy to observe by running the following scenario:
On 05/26/2014 09:35 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we
allocate space_info. When a user does something like:
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt -f
#
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:36:52AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -513,6 +513,14 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char
*options)
btrfs_info(root-fs_info,
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we
allocate space_info. When a user does something like:
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt -f
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1
On 05/27/2014 12:59 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we
allocate space_info. When a user does something like:
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt -f
#
On 05/27/2014 01:08 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 12:59 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we
allocate space_info. When a user does something like:
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
# btrfs balance start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/27/14, 1:22 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 01:08 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 12:59 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when
we allocate space_info. When a user does something
On 05/27/2014 01:20 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
- gpg control packet
On 5/27/14, 1:22 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 01:08 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 12:59 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when
we allocate space_info. When a
On heavy workloads, we're seeing soft lockup warnings on
root-inode_lock in __btrfs_release_delayed_node. The low hanging fruit
is to reduce the size of the critical section.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2
Hi,
Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for me on all 3.15-rc versions.
3.14 does not have this issue.
The process never gets unstuck. btrfs fi sync does not help. A hard
reboot seems to be the only way to recover.
The volume is still readable when it's in this state.
dmesg + sysrq-w is
On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
Hi,
Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for me on all 3.15-rc versions.
3.14 does not have this issue.
The process never gets unstuck. btrfs fi sync does not help. A hard
reboot seems to be the only way to recover.
The volume is still readable when
On 05/23/2014 07:13 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:24:49PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
I was able to kill btrfs send and receive, but mencoder is very hung, and
sync does not finish either:
10654 merlin syncsync_inodes_sb
17191 merlin sync
On 05/27/2014 10:08 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 09:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
Hi,
Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for me on all 3.15-rc versions.
3.14 does not have this issue.
The process never gets unstuck. btrfs fi sync does not help. A hard
On 05/27/2014 04:42 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 10:08 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 09:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
Hi,
Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for me on all 3.15-rc versions.
3.14 does not have this issue.
The process never gets
On 05/27/2014 04:50 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:42 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 10:08 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 09:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
Hi,
Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for me on all 3.15-rc versions.
3.14 does not
Hi David,
On 05/28/2014 12:22 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:36:52AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -513,6 +513,14 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char
*options)
On 05/16/2014 11:40 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:26:49AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
This patch adds an option '--check-data-csum' to verify data csums.
fsck won't check data csums unless users specify this option explictly.
Nice.
+static int read_extent_data(struct
On 27. mai 2014 23:15, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:50 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:42 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 10:08 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
On 05/27/2014 09:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote:
Hi,
Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for
21 matches
Mail list logo
