Hey Josef,
Seems there are a lot of brtfs bugs open on the kernel Bugzilla. I am
new to the brtfs
side of development so please let me known if you want help cleaning
up some of the
bugs here that are actually valid and still open.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
>> using one core to compress.
>> Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
>> make this much fa
On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
> using one core to compress.
> Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
> make this much faster
> with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I
On 07/27/2014 08:29 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Use backup superblocks if and only if
> the first superblock is valid but corrupted.
> From: Austin S Hemmelgarn
> To: Chris Mason , Qu Wenruo ,
>
> Date: 2014年07月27日 10:57
>> On 07/
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Use backup superblocks if and only if
the first superblock is valid but corrupted.
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn
To: Chris Mason , Qu Wenruo ,
Date: 2014年07月27日 10:57
On 07/24/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 06/26/2014 1
This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
using one core to compress.
Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
make this much faster
with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I would
recommend for writing compression
we write a fu
