Am Freitag, 19. September 2014, 13:51:22 schrieb Holger Hoffstätte:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:18:34 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
I have a particularly uncomplicated setup (a desktop PC with a hard
disk) and I'm seeing particularly slow performance from btrfs. A `git
status` in the linux
William Hanson posted on Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:50:05 -0400 as excerpted:
Hey guys...
I was just crawling through the wiki and this list's archive to find
answers about some questions. Actually many of them matching those
which Christoph has asked here some time ago, though it seems no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/14 09:23, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Am Freitag, 19. September 2014, 13:51:22 schrieb Holger
Hoffstätte:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:18:34 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
I have a particularly uncomplicated setup (a desktop PC with a
hard disk) and
Hi,
I am wondering: if I set up btrfs on two identical drives, with data
and metadata mirroring, will it be possible to use these drives
separately later on? Will just one of these drives work as a regular
btrfs-formatted single drive if connected to a different machine?
Thanks ahead,
Leonid.
--
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 07:11:52PM +0300, Leonid Bloch wrote:
I am wondering: if I set up btrfs on two identical drives, with data
and metadata mirroring, will it be possible to use these drives
separately later on? Will just one of these drives work as a regular
btrfs-formatted single drive
Hi,
Am Samstag 20 September 2014, 22:04:16 schrieb Wang Shilong:
Hi,
just my two cents here.^_^
Am Freitag, 19. September 2014, 13:51:22 schrieb Holger Hoffstätte:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:18:34 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
I have a particularly uncomplicated setup (a desktop PC with a
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/539433
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/583768
Authors:
Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org
Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
---
btrfs-convert.c | 2
From: Shawn Landen shawnland...@gmail.com
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/656955
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
---
ctree.h | 18 ++
volumes.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h
index
From: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/554059
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e721e99..441e925 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -26,7
Inspect arguments, if we are not called as btrfs, then assume we are
called to act like fsck.
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/712078
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
---
btrfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/btrfs.c b/btrfs.c
index
On a system running the Debian 3.14.15-2 kernel I added a new drive to a
RAID-1 array. My aim was to add a device and remove one of the old devices.
Sep 21 11:26:51 server kernel: [2070145.375221] BTRFS: lost page write due to
I/O error on /dev/sdc3
Sep 21 11:26:51 server kernel:
We need to have a way to determine the progress of a device delete operation.
Also for a balance of a RAID-1 that has more than 2 devices it would be good
to know how much space is used on each device.
Could btrfs fi df be extended to show information separately for each device?
--
My Main
Greeting to the Btrfs Developers and Community,
Today , I found a new bug on the kernel bugzilla related to btrfs and am
wondering if this bug has been fixed yet.
Further due to my limited knowledge of the btrfs code base, I lack the
knowledge to fix bugs like this yet.In addition,
due to this
btrfs_map_bio() first calls btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() which checks
fs state and increase bio_counter, then calls __btrfs_map_block() which
will take the dev_replace lock.
On the other hand, btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() takes dev_replace lock
first then set fs state to
14 matches
Mail list logo
