On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Zygo Blaxell
wrote:
>
> - single profile: we can tolerate zero missing disks,
> so we don't allow rw mounts even if degraded.
>
That seems like the wrong logic here. By all means mount read-only by
default for safety, but there sh
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:37:51AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> When btrfs allocate a chunk, it will try to alloc up to 1G for data and
> 256M for metadata, or 10% of all the writeable space if there is enough
10G for data,
if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
max_stripe_size
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:04:43PM -0500, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
> I have a 240GB VirtualBox vdi image that is showing heavy fragmentation
> (filefrag). The file was created in a dir that was chattr +C'd, the file
> was created via fallocate and the contents of the orignal image were
> copied into th
Hello,
I'm trying to change my 4 disk btrfs data from raid0 to raid1. The metadata is
allready in raid1 and now I'm trying to also make the data raid1.
I'm getting the following errors and I got told on irc to go report this as a
bug.
Hoping there is anybody that can give me a hand here in sol
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:13:27AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Zygo Blaxell posted on Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:35:29 -0400 as excerpted:
>
> > My pet peeve: if balance is converting profiles from RAID1 to single,
> > the conversion should be *instantaneous* (or at least small_constant *
> > number_of_block
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:22:36PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:07:31PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Just hit this while running trinity.
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 9612 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3799
> btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0x1d1/0x280 [btrfs]()
>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:58:25AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Zygo Blaxell
> wrote:
> >
> > - single profile: we can tolerate zero missing disks,
> > so we don't allow rw mounts even if degraded.
>
> That seems like the wrong log
On Oct 14, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Suman C wrote:
> After the reboot step, where I indicated that I mounted ro, I was
> unable to mount rw or rw,degraded. I get the "mount: wrong fs type,
> bad option, bad superblock…." error if I try to mount it rw.
I would test with kernel 3.17 at least, but better
Dear Developers / Maintainer,
I’ve set up a running RAID5 with three devices (sda1 / sdb1 /sdc1)
Mountpoint was /home, filesystem was mounted
A chain of unfortunal circumstances gives me the chance to run as root
in a terminal.
mkfs.ntfs /dev/sdb1
where /dev/sdb1 is device 1 in the Array.
After
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:52:47PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > I also see this WARN_ON being hit from the sync path..
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 11166 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3799
> > btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0x1d1/0x280 [btrfs]()
> > CPU: 2 PID: 11166 Comm: trinity-c61 Tainted: G
On Oct 24, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Jasper Verberk wrote:
>
> [60104.040776] BTRFS info (device sdc): 1046 enospc errors during balance
To get more information, remount with enospc_debug option, and try to convert
again.
> root@BlackMesa:/mnt# btrfs --version
> Btrfs v3.14.1
There are many fixes s
Did that, you can find the result in the pastebin.
http://paste.debian.net/128552/
> Subject: Re: Problem converting data raid0 to raid1: enospc errors during
> balance
> From: li...@colorremedies.com
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:11:21 -0600
> To: linux-bt
On Oct 24, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Jasper Verberk wrote:
> Did that, you can find the result in the pastebin.
>
> http://paste.debian.net/128552/
Maybe Josef or David will have some idea.
I'd still take a btrfs-image and btrfs check with current btrfs-progs.
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from t
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Zygo Blaxell
wrote:
>
> We could also leave this as an option to the user "mount -o
> degraded-and-I-want-to-lose-my-data", but in my opinion the use
> case is very, very exceptional.
Well, it is only exceptional if you never shut down dur
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 07:16:22PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> I attempted to run btrfs check --repair, but it got stuck spinning
> in what appeared to be an infinite loop. strace and ltrace revealed
> nothing, and gdb wasn't particularly helpful, so I rebuilt btrfs with
> debug symbols and tried
On 10/24/2014 04:49 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:04:43PM -0500, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
I have a 240GB VirtualBox vdi image that is showing heavy fragmentation
(filefrag). The file was created in a dir that was chattr +C'd, the file
was created via fallocate and the contents of
Robert White posted on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:41:32 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 10/24/2014 04:49 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:04:43PM -0500, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
>>> I have a 240GB VirtualBox vdi image that is showing heavy
>>> fragmentation (filefrag). The file was created in a
17 matches
Mail list logo
