Cyril Scetbon posted on Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:23 +0100 as excerpted:
Besides the first question, I met an issue using parent groups (see
http://pastebin.com/asT5ZFsi). I can't reproduce it all the time, but it
seems to appear frequently. Is there any know BUG that can be the source
of this
Rich Turner posted on Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:23:27 -0700 as excerpted:
let’s first assume the contents of /etc/fstab are either not used or
invalid in mounting the subvolumes. given the following ‘df’ command,
how do i know which subvolume of the btrfs filesystem on /dev/sda3 is
mounted at each
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:23:27AM -0700, Rich Turner wrote:
let’s first assume the contents of /etc/fstab are either not used or invalid
in mounting the subvolumes. given the following ‘df’ command, how do i know
which subvolume of the btrfs filesystem on /dev/sda3 is mounted at each mount
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:23:27AM -0700, Rich Turner wrote:
let’s first assume the contents of /etc/fstab are either not used or invalid
in mounting the subvolumes. given the following ‘df’ command, how do i know
which subvolume of the btrfs filesystem on /dev/sda3 is mounted at each mount
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 03:56:15AM -0700, lakshmi_narayanan...@dell.com wrote:
Hi,
Could you kindly help us with the list of all the btrfs file system
parameters , that can be tweaked for the best performance of the PCIe based
SSDs ?
It should detect the ssd option automatically, but
Hi Gui,
no worries. I'am happy with the btrfs fi sh (with or without patch)
I'll try your paches. At the moment I have started to recover the data
from an other device where some parts of the data was stored before.
Since there was no progress during mkfs I don't now what was affected
on the
Hi Linus,
We have a few fixes in my for-linus branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus
Filipe is nailing down some problems with our skinny extent variation,
and Dave's patch fixes endian problems in the new super block checks.
Filipe Manana (2)
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Merillat schreef op 30-10-14 04:17:
It's specifically BTRFS related, I was able to reproduce it on a bare
drive (no lvm, no md, no bcache). It's not bad RAM, I was
Hi.
I have a disk corruption problem. I run btrfs check on my system and
data partitions, and I got worrying results:
http://pastebin.com/hpi57xy6
What should I do now? Can I run btrfs check -repair on it, or does it
bear risk of shredding my data?
What other options do I have except of
Hmm I chose btrfs because it's the only one supported by docker that supports
quotas for the root user ...
Si i need to be sure it's really broken as I must use the version provided by
distribution I will use, i.e Ubuntu trusty.
I tried simple quotas and it seems to work, but I have an issue
On Nov 1, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Cyril Scetbon cyril.scet...@free.fr wrote:
Hmm I chose btrfs because it's the only one supported by docker that supports
quotas for the root user …
https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/3804
I don't think Docker is supporting quotas at all on anything yet. They
On 10/31/2014 05:15 AM, Zack Coffey wrote:
Sadly I think I understand now.
So by adding the second drive, BTRFS saw it as an extension of data (ala
JBOD-ish?). Even though I thought I was only adding RAID1 for metadata,
was also adding to the data storage.
I assume that even though
On 10/30/2014 07:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is hard to say. If a balance hasn't recently been done, the original device may
have a good amount of free space in allocated chunks. I'm pretty sure Btrfs
will write first to already allocated chunks with free space before allocating
new chunks? So
On 10/31/2014 10:34 AM, Tobias Holst wrote:
I am now using another system with kernel 3.17.2 and btrfs-tools 3.17
and inserted one of the two HDDs of my btrfs-RAID1 to it. I can't add
the second one as there are only two slots in that server.
This is what I got:
tobby@ubuntu: sudo btrfs
14 matches
Mail list logo
