Gareth Pye posted on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:24:03 +1100 as excerpted:
> Have gone with the move stuff off then finish convert plan. Convert has
> now finished and I'm 60% of the way through moving all the big files
> back on.
>
> Thanks for the help guys.
Glad the big-file-move-off seems to have wo
Allow read_tree_block() and read_node_slot() to return error pointer.
This should help caller to get more specified error number.
For existing callers, change (!eb) judgmentt to
(!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) to keep the compatibility, and for caller
missing the check, use PTR_ERR(eb) if possible.
Have gone with the move stuff off then finish convert plan. Convert
has now finished and I'm 60% of the way through moving all the big
files back on.
Thanks for the help guys.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:46:23 + (UTC)
> schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.d
Allow read_tree_block() and read_node_slot() to return error pointer.
This should help caller to get more specified error number.
For existing callers, change (!eb) judgmentt to
(!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) to keep the compatibility, and for caller
missing the check, use PTR_ERR(eb) if possible.
Unlike kernel, these functions in userland just test/set/clear a member.
So move them to header to avoid extra function call cost.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo
---
extent_io.c | 23 ---
extent_io.h | 26 ++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 05:31:43PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >+# get standard environment, filters and checks
> >+. ./common/rc
> >+. ./common/filter
> >+
> >+# real QA test starts here
> >+_supported_fs btrfs
> >+_supported_os Linux
> >+_require_scratch
> >+
> >+_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 || _
2015-01-26 22:14 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy :
>> is there a way to get the difference between these two files by making
>> use of btrfs?
>
> Snapper has this functionality built into it. I'm not sure if it uses
> diff or something else. But the Snapper GUI in yast2 on opensuse will
> let you see what f
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Stef Bon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a service/program for Linux which takes care of
> managing backupping of folders and the snapshots of those.
>
> The user can assign forlders he/she want to be backupped (corect
> English?), and create a profile for this fol
Hi,
I'm working on a service/program for Linux which takes care of
managing backupping of folders and the snapshots of those.
The user can assign forlders he/she want to be backupped (corect
English?), and create a profile for this folder. This profile is about
the files which will be taken into
It is not currently possible to deduplicate the last block of files
whose size is not a multiple of the block size, as the btrfs_extent_same
ioctl returns -EINVAL if offset + size is greater than the file size or
is not aligned to the fs block size. This prevents btrfs from freeing up
the last exte
Juergen Sauer posted on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:16:33 +0100 as excerpted:
> I think this is an Bug in btrfs send, not to check if an btrfs
> filesystem is mounted ro for refusing working.
>
> It may be much more easier to recover damaged systems, if such annoying
> thngs would not occour.
That has b
On 2015-01-25 23:22, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
It seems that the rate of spurious I/O errors varies most according to
the vm.vfs_cache_pressure sysctl. At '10' the I/O errors occur so often
that building a kernel is impossible. At '100' I can't reproduce even
a single I/O error.
I guess this is own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
this weekend a ssd disk got an problem.
No Problem, I thought... but real word acts sometime other the you think :)
1. Szenario
I got an media Error on a ssd disk. So, I think trimming the whole
device may work.
Mounting the btrfs in rw is not
This patch needs
[PATCH 1/1] Btrfs: btrfs_release_super_kobj() should clean up the
kobject data
further, I am planning to clean up and split below patch to show
the enhancements and fix-ups separately. Will send V2 soon. Thanks.
Anand
On 01/20/2015 12:02 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
This patc
The following test case which is a fair tweak with in the funcation
open_ctree() fails with an error from kobject module, indicating that
thread tried to init an initialized object.
kernel: [232104.016513] kobject (880006c1c980): tried to init an
initialized object, something is seriously wro
I think we won't need this patch. the coming sysfs changes will
have entry point to handle missing devices/FSID. (inspired by md).
That will be much cleaner to trigger the clean up based on the
device FS changes.
The proposed fix in this Patch, can it handle things like when
customer decides to
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH v5] btrfs: add regression test for remount with
thread_pool resized
From: Xing Gu
To:
Date: 2015年01月26日 16:43
Regression test for a btrfs issue of resizing 'thread_pool' when
remount the fs.
This regression was introduced by the following l
On 01/24/2015 06:30 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:36:37PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:28:59PM +0800, Xing Gu wrote:
Regression test for a btrfs issue of resizing 'thread_pool' when
remount the fs.
This regression was introduced by the following lin
Regression test for a btrfs issue of resizing 'thread_pool' when
remount the fs.
This regression was introduced by the following linux kernel commit:
btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered
execution based on kernel workqueue
08a9ff3264181986d1d692a4e6fce3669700c9f8
And
Signed-off-by: Xing Gu
---
utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 9b08144..48f85b1 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ int btrfs_prepare_device(int fd, char *file, int zero_end,
u64 *block_count_ret,
20 matches
Mail list logo
