On Friday 17 Jul 2015 06:16:02 Brian Foster wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:56:43AM -0400, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
When running generic/311 on Btrfs' subpagesize-blocksize patchset (on
ppc64
with 4k sectorsize and 16k node/leaf size) I noticed the following call
trace,
BTRFS
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens
jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com wrote:
Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send
was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 06:23:13PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
On 07/17/2015 04:49 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
To avoid deadlock described in commit 084b6e7c7607 (btrfs: Fix a lockdep
warning when running xfstest.),
we should move kobj stuff out of dev_replace lock range.
Is this just a lock
Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,
[ 1226.649039] =
[ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
[ 1226.649039]
To avoid deadlock described in commit 084b6e7c7607 (btrfs: Fix a lockdep
warning when running xfstest.),
we should move kobj stuff out of dev_replace lock range.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
nice clean up thanks. but... more below.
On 07/16/2015 08:15 PM, Zhaolei wrote:
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
Code for updating fs_info-num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in
btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support.
Reason:
Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with
sorry I indented to use btrfs_err() and I have no idea
how btrfs_error() got there.
infact I was thinking about these kind of oversights
since these two func are too closely named.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
Hi, Anand Jain
Thanks for review it.
-Original Message-
From: Anand Jain [mailto:anand.j...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:12 PM
To: Zhaolei; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in
From: Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com
Currently there is not way for a user to know what is the minimum size a
device of a btrfs filesystem can be resized to. Sometimes the value of
total allocated space (sum of all allocated chunks/device extents), which
can be parsed from 'btrfs filesystem
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
We can get mount-fail in following operation:
# mkfs a raid1 filesystem
mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/vdd /dev/vde
# destroy a disk
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vde bs=1M count=1
# do some fs operation on degraded mode
mount -o degraded
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:56:43AM -0400, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
When running generic/311 on Btrfs' subpagesize-blocksize patchset (on ppc64
with 4k sectorsize and 16k node/leaf size) I noticed the following call trace,
BTRFS (device dm-0): parent transid verify failed on 29720576 wanted 160
On 07/17/2015 04:49 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
To avoid deadlock described in commit 084b6e7c7607 (btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning
when running xfstest.),
we should move kobj stuff out of dev_replace lock range.
Is this just a lock optimizing patch or fixing _a_ cause for the
deadlock. ? Am I
On 07/16/2015 04:44 PM, Zhaolei wrote:
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
When mount failed because missing device, we can see following
dmesg:
[ 1060.267743] BTRFS: too many missing devices, writeable mount is not allowed
[ 1060.273158] BTRFS: open_ctree failed
This patch add
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
On Thursday 09 July 2015 22:06:09 Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:34:40PM +0200, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
Hi,
I have a btrfs raid10 which is connected to a server hosting
multiple virtual machine. Does btrfs support
Hey, Filipe,
I've been seeing errors of this sort:
[ 658.221300] [ cut here ]
[ 658.221948] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1636 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9460
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x16b/0x210()
[ 658.223274] CPU: 0 PID: 1636 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted
Hi Linus,
We have some fixes in my for-linus-4.2 branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git
for-linus-4.2
These are all from Filipe, and cover a few problems we've had reported
on the list recently (along with ones he found on his own).
Filipe Manana (5)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Omar Sandoval osan...@fb.com wrote:
Hey, Filipe,
I've been seeing errors of this sort:
[ 658.221300] [ cut here ]
[ 658.221948] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1636 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9460
17 matches
Mail list logo
