This patch adds the file required for Hybrid Storage. It contains
the memory, time and size limits for the cache and the statistics that
will be provided while the cache is operating.
It also adds the Makefile changes needed to add the Hybrid Storage.
Signed-off-by: Sanidhya Solanki
---
fs/btrfs
On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 08:06 +, Duncan wrote:
> I wasn't personally sure if 4.1 itself was affected or not, but the
> wiki
> says don't use 4.1.1 as it's broken with this bug, with the quick-fix
> in
> 4.1.2, so I /think/ 4.1 itself is fine. A scan with a current btrfs
> check should tell y
Last thing for tonight, I tried to run btrfs-debug-tree & direct the
output to a file. It crashed during the run with the following
errors:
john@mariposa:~$ sudo btrfs-debug-tree /dev/md125p2 >>
/media/data1/btrfs-debug-tree-01012016.txt
parent transid verify failed on 519273742336 wanted 1036426
Hi,
When trying to send a snapshot I'm now getting errors such as:
ERROR: failed to open
backups/xps13/@home/@home.20151229_13:43:09/alistair/.mozilla/firefox/yu3bxg7y.default/cookies.sqlite.
No such file or directory
and
ERROR: could not find parent subvolume
This script has been running wi
On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 08:13 +, Duncan wrote:
> you can also try a read-only scrub
OT: I just wondered, would a balance include everything a scrub
includes (i.e. read+verify all data and rebuild an errors on different
devices / block copies)... of course in addition to also copying all
"good" da
Hi Duncan,
Doing some more digging, I ran btrfs-image & found the following
errors. I'm not sure how useful this is, or what this means in terms
of the other btrfs-tools messages. Maybe more clues?
Thanks.
-John
john@mariposa:~$ sudo btrfs-image -c9 -t4 /dev/md125p2
/media/data1/btrfs.ima
here is the info requested, if that helps anyone.
# uname -a
Linux SX20S 4.3.0-040300rc7-generic #201510260712 SMP Mon Oct 26
11:27:59 UTC 2015 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
# aptitude show btrfs-tools
Package: btrfs-tools
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 4.2.1+ppa1-1~ubuntu15.10.1
I have been unable to reproduce so far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Duncan,
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> John Center posted on Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:41:20 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> If this doesn't resolve the problem, what would you recommend my next
>> steps should be? I've been hesitant to run too many of the btrfs-too
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 4:51 PM, fugazzi® wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> It's a few weeks that I converted my root partition into btrfs with three sub-
> volumes named boot,root,home. I'm booting with /boot on subvol.
>
> I'm using btrfs send and receive to make backup of the three snapshotted
> subvolume
I accidentically sent my messages directly to Duncan, I am copying them
in here.
Hello Duncan,
Thank you for the amazing response. Wow, you are awesome.
Here is the output of fi show, fi df and mount, sorry for not providing
them to begin with:
http://pastebin.com/DpiuDvRy
> On 01 Jan 2016, a
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Rasmus Abrahamsen wrote:
> Happy New Year!
>
> I have a raid with a 1TB, .5TB, 1.5TB and recently added a 4TB and want to
> remove the 1.5TB. When saying btrfs dev delete it turned into readonly. I am
> on 4.2.5-1-ARCH and btrfs-progs v4.3.1 what can I do?
btrfs
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 13:20:49 CET schrieb John Center:
> > On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Martin Steigerwald
> > wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 11:41:20 CET schrieb John Center:
[…]
> >>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:55 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A couple months ag
Hi Duncan,
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> John Center posted on Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:41:20 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> Ok, I'll upgrade to 4.3 & see if that resolves the problem with
>> scrubbing.
>> I was wondering when I compiled the btrfs-tools if there wo
Hi Martin,
Happy New Year!
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 11:41:20 CET schrieb John Center:
>
> Happy New Year!
>
>>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:55 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> A couple months ago, which would have made
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 11:41:20 CET schrieb John Center:
Happy New Year!
> > On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:55 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > John Center posted on Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:20:28 -0500 as excerpted:
> >
> >
> >> I run a weekly scrub, using Marc Merlin's btrfs-scrub
John Center posted on Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:41:20 -0500 as excerpted:
> Ok, I'll upgrade to 4.3 & see if that resolves the problem with
> scrubbing.
> I was wondering when I compiled the btrfs-tools if there would be a
> problem with them not being in sync with the major kernel version.
FWIW newer
Hi Duncan,
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:55 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> John Center posted on Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:20:28 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> I run a weekly scrub, using Marc Merlin's btrfs-scrub script.
>> Usually, it completes without a problem, but this week it failed. I ran
>>
Rasmus Abrahamsen posted on Fri, 01 Jan 2016 12:47:08 +0100 as excerpted:
> Happy New Year!
>
> I have a raid with a 1TB, .5TB, 1.5TB and recently added a 4TB and want
> to remove the 1.5TB. When saying btrfs dev delete it turned into
> readonly. I am on 4.2.5-1-ARCH and btrfs-progs v4.3.1 what c
Sorry, I forgot to mention that this freeze is happening after I converted
this backup drive to btrfs, before it was XFS. So sending to XFS drive didn't
caused the freeze while sending with the same script to btrfs formatted drive
freeze the system. Kernel and btrfs progs were the same.
Regards
Sorry, I forgot to mention that this freeze is happening after I converted
this backup drive to btrfs, before it was XFS. So sending to XFS drive didn't
caused the freeze while sending with the same script to btrfs formatted drive
freeze the system. Kernel and btrfs progs were the same.
Regards
Hi everyone.
It's a few weeks that I converted my root partition into btrfs with three sub-
volumes named boot,root,home. I'm booting with /boot on subvol.
I'm using btrfs send and receive to make backup of the three snapshotted
subvolumes on a second btrfs formatted drive with three commands lik
Hi,
if I try to repair filesystem got I'am assert. I use Raid6.
Linux dibsi 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1
(2015-02-12) x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@dibsi:~/btrfs-progs# btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 6a2f3936-d0ef-43c0-9815-41e24f2bc21a
Total devices 1 FS bytes use
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 08:16:28PM +0800, UGlee wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> If a btrfs device is missing, the command tool tells user the devid of
> the missing devices.
>
> I understand that each device (disk) in a btrfs volume has been
> assigned a uuid (UUID_SUB field in udevadm info output). If th
Dear all:
If a btrfs device is missing, the command tool tells user the devid of
the missing devices.
I understand that each device (disk) in a btrfs volume has been
assigned a uuid (UUID_SUB field in udevadm info output). If the device
is missing, it's hard to tell user to input such uuid string
Happy New Year!
I have a raid with a 1TB, .5TB, 1.5TB and recently added a 4TB and want to
remove the 1.5TB. When saying btrfs dev delete it turned into readonly. I am on
4.2.5-1-ARCH and btrfs-progs v4.3.1 what can I do?
On top of that, my linux is on this same raid, so perhaps btrfs is writing
Happy NY!
I have a raid with a 1TB, .5TB, 1.5TB and recently added a 4TB and want to
remove the 1.5TB.
When saying btrfs dev delete it turned into readonly. I am on 4.2.5-1-ARCH and
btrfs-progs v4.3.1 what can I do?
On top of that, my linux is on this same raid, so perhaps btrfs is writing some
First: Happy New Year to you!
Second: Take your time. I know its holidays for many. For me it means I easily
have time to follow-up on this.
Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 09:20:45 CET schrieb Qu Wenruo:
> Chris Mason wrote on 2015/12/15 16:59 -0500:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:08:16AM +0800
Chris Murphy posted on Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:54:42 -0700 as excerpted:
> I haven't previously heard of this use case for -c option.
> It seems to work (no errors or fs weirdness afterward).
>
> The gist:
> send a snapshot from drive 1 to drive 2;
> rw snapshot of the drive 2 copy,
> and then make c
Chris Murphy posted on Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:22:09 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had a power fail today at my home server and after the reboot the
>> btrfs RAID1 won't come back up.
>>
>> When trying to mount one of the 2 disk
30 matches
Mail list logo
