Marc MERLIN posted on Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:09:30 -0800 as excerpted:
[line in fstab]
> LABEL=btrfs_space /var/local/space btrfs
> subvol=varlocalspace,defaults,compress=lzo,skip_balance,noatime,noexec 0 0
Nothing to do with your issue at hand, but some potentially useful info, FWIW...
The "
On 02/28/2016 01:17 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 09:44:36AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
If you have a choice pls add, 'btrfs fi show -d' as well for the outputs
to be taken at the time of boot just before system's 'btrfs dev scan',
Ok, I had to reboot anyway, so here's the sta
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 09:44:36AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> If you have a choice pls add, 'btrfs fi show -d' as well for the outputs
> to be taken at the time of boot just before system's 'btrfs dev scan',
Ok, I had to reboot anyway, so here's the state when it's bad:
gargamel:~# btrfs fi show
Γιώργος Πάλλας posted on Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:45:03 +0200
as excerpted:
> Hi all.
>
> If I have a btrfs subvolume 'subv' and then subvolumes subv/sub1,
> subv/sub2, subv/sub3, is there a way to snapshot all the subv tree and
> then recursively send it remotely?
>
> I think this would be the anal
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 09:44:36AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> Marc,
>
> > Err, I'm very perplexed now. I already have a scan in my boot process
> > after device decrypts.
> > Somehow it saw one of my 2 devices, but not the other one?
>
> If blkid shows both the devices and if you are running '
Marc,
> Err, I'm very perplexed now. I already have a scan in my boot process
> after device decrypts.
> Somehow it saw one of my 2 devices, but not the other one?
If blkid shows both the devices and if you are running 'btrfs dev scan'
during boot, then yes kernel should see both the devices.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:06:06AM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> Can you grep this message since btrfs dev scan has a "printf("Scanning for
> Btrfs filesystems\n");"?
> And if a scan failed somehow, it may print an error after this message
> and we then know what was happening..
I'm not seeing anything
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:58:00AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Can you log the output of blkid here. If blkid output does
> not report all the btrfs devs correctly the kernel won't know
> as well.
Sure. The relevant entries are at the bottom (last 3 lines).
It looks good now of course, but I
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 01:08:29AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:15:21AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > On Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 22:14:50 CET Marc Haber wrote:
> > > I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
> > > (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 o
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:15:21AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> On Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 22:14:50 CET Marc Haber wrote:
> > I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
> > (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable):
> >
> > mh@fan:~$ sudo btrfs ba
On Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 22:14:50 CET Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Marc.
> I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
> (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable):
>
> mh@fan:~$ sudo btrfs balance start /mnt/fanbtr
> ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt
On 02/27/2016 11:03 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:45:34PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:39:38PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
btrfs-tools 4.4-1
gargamel:~# uname -r
4.4.2-amd64-i915-volpreempt-20160214bc2
2 drive array stopped working after a crash/reboot. C
Hi,
I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
(with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable):
mh@fan:~$ sudo btrfs balance start /mnt/fanbtr
ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt/fanbtr': No space left on device
mh@fan:~$ sudo btrfs fi show /mnt/fanbtr
mh@fan:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:03:04PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:45:34PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:39:38PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > > btrfs-tools 4.4-1
> > > gargamel:~# uname -r
> > > 4.4.2-amd64-i915-volpreempt-20160214bc2
> > >
> > > 2 dri
Hi all.
If I have a btrfs subvolume 'subv' and then subvolumes subv/sub1,
subv/sub2, subv/sub3, is there a way to snapshot all the subv tree and
then recursively send it remotely?
I think this would be the analogous of zfs snapshot -r, and then zfs
send -R.
thanks!
Giorgos
--
To unsubscri
Hi,
cannot recover my home filesystem.
Linux dibsi 4.2.0-30-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19 13:52:26 UTC 2016 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.4
btrfs fi show
Label: 'root' uuid: 3d279e92-d021-4a57-92b8-db3bfcbba79d
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 74.47
16 matches
Mail list logo