We need to call free_extent_map() on the em we look up.Btrfs: fix em leak in
find_first_block_group
We need to call free_extent_map() on the em we look up.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:37:21PM +0100, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Filipe Manana
If we rename an inode A (be it a file or a directory), create a new
inode B with the old name of inode A and under the same parent directory,
fsync inode B and then power fail, at log tree replay time we en
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:26:58PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:42:55AM -0400, Sanidhya Solanki wrote:
> > > I'll comment on the overall approach and skip code-specific comments.
> > >
> > > The changelog does not explain why there's a need for a new blockgroup
> > > typ
On 08/18/2016 08:46 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:04:53AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
From: Anand Jain
At the end of unmount/dev-delete, if the device exclusive open is not
actually closed, then there might be a race with another program in
the userland who is trying to ope
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:42:55AM -0400, Sanidhya Solanki wrote:
> > I'll comment on the overall approach and skip code-specific comments.
> >
> > The changelog does not explain why there's a need for a new blockgroup
> > type and what's the relation to the existing types. It seems that it
> > ex
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:04:53AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> From: Anand Jain
>
> At the end of unmount/dev-delete, if the device exclusive open is not
> actually closed, then there might be a race with another program in
> the userland who is trying to open the device in exclusive mode and
> it
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:09:50AM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> Function start_transaction() can return ERR_PTR(1) when flush is
> BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, so the call graph is
>
> start_transaction (return ERR_PTR(1))
> -> btrfs_block_rsv_add (return 1)
> -> reserve_metadata_bytes (return 1)
>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote:
> v3: we introduce a atomic_t fs_frozen, and if fs_frozen is 1, we can not
> handle delayed iputs.
> v4: change atomic_t fs_frozen to be int.
As it is now, I think the barriers are not needed. The freeze callback
sets it and then
