On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 12:07:26PM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote:
> In original common/populate codes, we put _require_xfs_io_command "falloc" and
> _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" in the begin of common/populate, but it's
> not appropriate, for fs, which does not support falloc and punch, will not
Not sure if there's anything I can do about this or not. I suspect
not, but if anyone's got any good ideas about fixing it, please let me
know...
My server crashed earlier this evening -- an OOM tried to kill
qemu, and kvm took exception to it.
After rebooting, my 6-device RAID-1 btrfs a
From: Jeff Mahoney
If we process the last item in the leaf and hit an I/O error while
reading the next leaf, we return -EIO without having adjusted the
position. Since we have emitted dirents, getdents() will return
the byte count to the user instead of the error. Subsequent callers
will emit t
From: Jeff Mahoney
Commit 3de4586c527 (Btrfs: Allow subvolumes and snapshots anywhere
in the directory tree) introduced the current system of placing
snapshots in the directory tree. It also introduced the behavior of
creating the snapshot and then creating the directory entries for it.
We've k
ned this up in the next patch that I'm still testing.
I'll re-send.
-Jeff
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/jeffm-suse-com/btrfs-remove-old-tree_root-dirent-processing-in-btrfs_real_readdir/20161105-104432
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ker
Resent because I don't see it in ml
Hi Qu,
On 2016-11-04 03:10, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[...]
>
> I reproduced your problem and find that seems to be a problem of race.
[...]
[...]>
> I digged a little further into the case 2) and found:
> a) Kernel is scrubbing correct ran
