Hello,
on a system with 4.9.0-rc7 I have the problem, that ‘scrub status’
blocks when a scru is running.
Example. I startet a scrub and then (in another shell) ‘scrub status’
was startet while. It blocked and returned only after the scrub
finished (hours later) with:
WARNING: failed to read
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I didn't add umount at end of the test because...
> _check_btrfs_filesystem() does it, which gets called as this test does not
Nop it doesn't.
See common/check:
_check_filesystems()
{
if [ -f ${RESULT_DIR}/require_test ]; then
On 12/02/16 18:54, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
Hi,
I didn't add umount at end of the test because...
_check_btrfs_filesystem() does it, which gets called as this test does not
Nop it doesn't.
See common/check:
_check_filesystems()
{
if [ -f
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:13:37AM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:21:35PM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> sorry last
On 2016-12-01 15:32, Mike Fleetwood wrote:
On 1 December 2016 at 18:43, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
Currently, `btrfs device stats` returns non-zero only when there was an
error getting the counter values. This is fine for when it gets run by a
user directly, but is a serious pain when trying
Currently, `btrfs device stats` returns non-zero only when there was an
error getting the counter values. This is fine for when it gets run by a
user directly, but is a serious pain when trying to use it in a script or
for monitoring since you need to parse the (not at all machine friendly)
output
Hi, all, this is my first posting to the mailing list. I am a
long-time file system guy who is just starting to take a serious
interest in btrfs.
My company's product uses btrfs for its backing storage. We
maintain a log file to let us synchronize after reboots. In
testing, we find that when th
Hi,
Le 02/12/2016 à 20:07, Blake Lewis a écrit :
> Hi, all, this is my first posting to the mailing list. I am a
> long-time file system guy who is just starting to take a serious
> interest in btrfs.
>
> My company's product uses btrfs for its backing storage. We
> maintain a log file to let us
Well, 3.10 is what you get with the RHEL7.x distributions, so that's
why people are running it.
Apparently, it is "good enough" for many purposes.
My real goal here is to understand the scope of the bug and whether
any mitigation is
possible. Of course, I don't expect anyone else to make a patch
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 12:07:21AM -0500, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> There are 11 functions that accept a root parameter and immediately
> overwrite it. We can pass those an fs_info pointer instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h| 4 +
01.12.2016 18:48, Chris Murphy пишет:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 01.12.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Hans van Kranenburg:
>>> On 12/01/2016 09:12 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote
Blake Lewis posted on Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:36:29 -0800 as excerpted:
> Well, 3.10 is what you get with the RHEL7.x distributions, so that's why
> people are running it.
> Apparently, it is "good enough" for many purposes.
>
> My real goal here is to understand the scope of the bug and whether any
I got tired of seeing "16.00EiB" whenever btrfs-progs encounters a
negative size value.
e.g. during filesystem shrink we see:
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/testvol0 16.00EiB
Interpreting this as a signed quantity is much more useful:
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/testvol0 -26.29GiB
Signed-off-b
Thanks, Duncan. Your points are very reasonable and I will be doing
a bisect, as you suggest (though I don't know that the problem is fixed
in later releases, just that we couldn't reproduce it readily). Just to be
clear, I am not looking for support. I just hoped that perhaps this had
been a co
14 matches
Mail list logo
