Re: BTRFS hybrid system setup issues

2017-02-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:47:40AM +0530, Bhasker C V wrote: > I compiled kernel 4.10 and I can confirm it is working fnie now. 4.10 > has the compat-ioctl patches for btrfs progs to work with x86_64 > kernel in i386 userland. So does 4.9.10 if you prefer running long-lived releases. --

Re: BTRFS hybrid system setup issues

2017-02-25 Thread Bhasker C V
I compiled kernel 4.10 and I can confirm it is working fnie now. 4.10 has the compat-ioctl patches for btrfs progs to work with x86_64 kernel in i386 userland. thanks to all On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > On 02/25/2017 08:30 PM,

Re: BTRFS hybrid system setup issues

2017-02-25 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
On 02/25/2017 08:30 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an x86_64 kernel running with i386 userland rootfs. Which kernel version? (`uname -a`) > Long back I believe there were some fixes for btrfs-tools which ran > smoothly in this setup but after several dist-upgrades(debian) and >

BTRFS hybrid system setup issues

2017-02-25 Thread Bhasker C V
Hi all, I have an x86_64 kernel running with i386 userland rootfs. Long back I believe there were some fixes for btrfs-tools which ran smoothly in this setup but after several dist-upgrades(debian) and long forgotten command, the btrfs-tools commands have started to fail for instance $ sudo

Re: Subvolume corruption after restart on Raid1 array

2017-02-25 Thread Kenneth Bogert
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Hans van Kranenburg > wrote: > > On 02/23/2017 05:42 PM, Kenneth Bogert wrote: >> >>> On Feb 17, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Kenneth Bogert wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Kenneth Bogert

linux 4.8 kernel OOM

2017-02-25 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hey guys, I believe I have seen a OOM situations reported on the ML and IRC recently, both of which are believed to be unrelated to btrfs, which this case is probably as well; I just want to provide my dmesg here anyway in case it turns out to be related to btrfs nonetheless. The following

Re: [PATCH 0/3] introduce type based delalloc metadata reserve to fix some false enospc issues

2017-02-25 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Dear Qu, any news on your branch? I still don't see it merged anywhere. Greets, Stefan Am 04.01.2017 um 17:13 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: > Hi Qu, > > Am 01.01.2017 um 10:32 schrieb Qu Wenruo: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I'm trying to push it to for-next (will be v4.11), but no response yet.