Hi Filipe,
At 02/15/2017 04:35 AM, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Filipe Manana
Test that both a full and incremental btrfs send operation preserves file
holes.
I found the test case fails with compress=lzo mount option.
In fact, it turns out to be 2 bugs:
[Inline-then-regular layout]
An
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:22:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 03/21/2017 12:51 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > Hi Qu,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:08:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > Btrfs in-band de-duplication test cases for in-memory backend, which
> > > covers
> > > the bugs exposed
At 03/21/2017 12:51 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
Hi Qu,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:08:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Btrfs in-band de-duplication test cases for in-memory backend, which covers
the bugs exposed during the development.
Do you have a kernel tree that contains the in-band patches so that
Hi Qu,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:08:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Btrfs in-band de-duplication test cases for in-memory backend, which covers
> the bugs exposed during the development.
Do you have a kernel tree that contains the in-band patches so that I
and others could try and run these tests
At 03/21/2017 10:08 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:44:18AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 03/21/2017 04:23 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:21:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 03/18/2017 10:03 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:28:45PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wro
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:44:18AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 03/21/2017 04:23 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:21:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > At 03/18/2017 10:03 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:28:45PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > >
There have been some discussions about inconsistent device between
/proc/pid/maps and stat(2).
http://thr3ads.net/btrfs-devel/2011/05/2346176-RFC-PATCH-0-2-btrfs-vfs-Return-same-device-in-stat-2-and-proc-pid-maps
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg09044.html
https://patchwork.kernel.org
In check_convert_image(), for normal HOLE case, if the file extents are
smaller than image size, we set ret to -EINVAL and print error message.
But forget to return.
This patch adds the missing return to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo
---
convert/main.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
At 03/21/2017 04:23 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:21:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 03/18/2017 10:03 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:28:45PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 03/17/2017 12:44 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:20:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wro
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:39PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can read fs_info from dev.
>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo
Thanks,
-liubo
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/reada.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reada.c b/fs/btrf
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 00:45 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > >
> > > Only btrfs, ext4, and xfs implement it for data changes. Because of
> > > this, these filesystems
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:36PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can read fs_info from dev.
>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo
Thanks,
-liubo
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/reada.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reada.c b/fs/btrfs
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:42PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> The name is misleading and the local variable serves no purpose.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo
Thanks,
-liubo
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/reada.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:33PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can read fs_info from eb.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo
Thanks,
-liubo
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 +--
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 4 ++--
> fs/btrfs/reada.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:30PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can preallocate the node so insertion does not have to do that under
> the lock. The GFP flags for the global radix tree are initialized to
> GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
> but we can use GFP_KERNEL, because readahead is option
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:26PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> No point using radix_tree_gang_lookup if we're looking up just one slot.
>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo
Thanks,
-liubo
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/reada.c | 52 ++--
> 1 f
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:02:23PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can preallocate the node so insertion does not have to do that under
> the lock. The GFP flags for the per-device radix tree are initialized to
> GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
> but we can use GFP_KERNEL, same as an allocation a
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:21:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 03/18/2017 10:03 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:28:45PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > At 03/17/2017 12:44 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:20:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:30:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 03/18/2017 10:12 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:20:23PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > When dev-replace and scrub are run at the same time, dev-replace can be
> > > canceled by scrub. It's quite common for btrfs/
Ilan,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Ilan Schwarts wrote:
> I need to cast struct inode to struct btrfs_inode.
> in order to do it, i looked at implementation of btrfs_getattr.
>
> the code is simple:
> struct btrfs_inode *btrfsInode;
> btrfsInode = BTRFS_I(inode);
>
> in order to compile i mu
On Fri 17-03-17 07:23:24, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> On 03/16/2017 04:31 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:51:04PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> >> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues
> >>
> >> A new flag BIO_NOWAIT is introduced to identify bio's
> >> orignating from iocb with IOCB_N
I need to cast struct inode to struct btrfs_inode.
in order to do it, i looked at implementation of btrfs_getattr.
the code is simple:
struct btrfs_inode *btrfsInode;
btrfsInode = BTRFS_I(inode);
in order to compile i must add the headers on top of the function:
#include "/data/kernel/linux-4.1.2
22 matches
Mail list logo
