OK, I seriously need to address that, as during the night I lost
3 GB again:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 10:35:12 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> # btrfs fi sh /
>> Label: none uuid: 17a3de25-6e26-4b0b-9665-ac267f6f6c4a
>> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 44.10GiB
Total devices 2 FS byte
Being a Netapp user for a long time, I have always missed btrfs snapshots
the way Netapp creates them.
I have now written snaprotate:
http://fex.belwue.de/snaprotate.html
snaprotate creates and manages btrfs readonly snapshots similar to Netapp.
Snapshots have names like hourly, daily, weekly, s
On Sat 2017-12-02 (13:53), Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> Being a Netapp user for a long time, I have always missed btrfs snapshots
> the way Netapp creates them.
>
> I have now written snaprotate:
>
> http://fex.belwue.de/snaprotate.html
Uuuppps.. just found, I have posted this 2017-09-09 already!
Sor
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 18:57:08 -0800, Duncan wrote:
> OK, is this supposed to be raid1 or single data, because the above shows
> metadata as all raid1, while some data is single tho most is raid1, and
> while old mkfs used to create unused single chunks on raid1 that had to
> be removed manually via
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 17:28:12 +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>> Suppose you start with a 100 MiB file (I'm adjusting the sizes down from
> [...]
>> Now make various small changes to the file, say under 16 KiB each. These
>> will each be COWed elsewhere as one might expect. by default 16 KiB at
>> a
01.12.2017 21:04, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
> On 2017-12-01 12:13, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 01.12.2017 20:06, Hans van Kranenburg пишет:
>>>
>>> Additional tips (forgot to ask for your /proc/mounts before):
>>> * Use the noatime mount option, so that only accessing files does not
>>> lead to ch
Tomasz Pala posted on Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:18:19 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 17:28:12 +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>
>>> Suppose you start with a 100 MiB file (I'm adjusting the sizes down from
>> [...]
>>> Now make various small changes to the file, say under 16 KiB each. These
>>