Hi,
> This bug only affects 5.10 kernels, and the regression was introduced in
> 5.10-rc1 by commit 0eb79294dbe328 ("btrfs: dio iomap DSYNC workaround").
> The bug does not exist in 5.11 kernels due to commit ecfdc08b8cc65d
> ("btrfs: remove dio iomap DSYNC workaround"), which depends on other
> c
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:46:07AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:12 PM Zygo Blaxell
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > If we want the data compressed (and who doesn't? journal data compresses
> > 8:1 with btrfs zstd) then we'll always need to make a copy at close.
> > Because system
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:26:41PM +, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 05:08:05AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:30:38PM +0100, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> > > From: Michal Rostecki
> > >
> > > Add the btrfs_check_mixed() function which checks if the
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 05:08:05AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:30:38PM +0100, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> > From: Michal Rostecki
> >
> > Add the btrfs_check_mixed() function which checks if the filesystem has
> > the mixed type of devices (non-rotational and rotationa
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:19:45PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:58:19PM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:13:54PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:21:36PM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > > > This patchset provides support
Hi Anand,
re: inflight calculation
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:55:33PM +, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> > It is better to have random workloads in the above three categories
> > of configs.
> >
> > Apart from the above three configs, there is also
> > all-non-rotational with hetero
> > For exampl
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:25:18PM -0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Move the static function scrub_checksum_tree_block() before its use in
> the scrub.c, and drop its declaration.
>
> No functional changes.
We've rejected patches that move static function within one file unless
there's another reason f
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:38:28PM +0800, Su Yue wrote:
> User reported that btrfs-progs misc-tests/028-superblock-recover fails:
> [TEST/misc] 028-superblock-recover
> unexpected success: mounted fs with corrupted superblock
> test failed for case 028-superblock-recover
>
> The test case ex