Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax

2021-03-13 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 11:24:00AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 8:09 AM Adam Borowski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:26:43PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:21:59AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > > > DAX on btrfs has been attempte

Re: BTRFS error (device sda1): bdev /dev/sdb1 errs: wr 2702175, rd 2719033, flush 0, corrupt 6, gen 0

2021-03-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 5:22 AM Thomas <74cmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gerät Boot Anfang Ende Sektoren Größe Kn Typ > /dev/sdb1 2048 496093750 496091703 236,6G 83 Linux > However the output of btrfs insp dump-s is different: > thomas@pc1-desktop:~ > $ sudo btrfs insp dump-s /de

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax

2021-03-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 8:09 AM Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:26:43PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:21:59AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > > DAX on btrfs has been attempted[1]. Of course, we could not > > > > But why? A completeness fetish?

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax

2021-03-13 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:26:43PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:21:59AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > DAX on btrfs has been attempted[1]. Of course, we could not > > But why? A completeness fetish? I don't understand why you decided > to do this work. * xfs ca

Re: BTRFS error (device sda1): bdev /dev/sdb1 errs: wr 2702175, rd 2719033, flush 0, corrupt 6, gen 0

2021-03-13 Thread Thomas
The partitions on both SSD are equal in size: homas@pc1-desktop:~ $ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda Festplatte /dev/sda: 238,47 GiB, 256060514304 Bytes, 500118192 Sektoren Festplattenmodell: SanDisk SD8SBAT2 Einheiten: Sektoren von 1 * 512 = 512 Bytes Sektorgröße (logisch/physikalisch): 512 Bytes / 512 Byte