now what's about.
Can just confirm that everything seems OK ?
Do you think of an another test I should do before starting to use my
array again ?
Le 29/09/2016 à 14:55, Alexandre Poux a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I finally did it : patched the kernel and removed the device.
> As expected he did n
a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Alexandre Poux <pums...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:46, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alexandre Poux <pums...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:11, Chri
Le 15/09/2016 à 23:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Alexandre Poux <pums...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 15/09/2016 à 18:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Alexandre Poux <pums...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
Thank you very much for your answers
Le 15/09/2016 à 17:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Poux <pums...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is it possible to do some king of a "btrfs delete missing" on this
>> kind of setup, in orde
I had a btrfs partition on a 6 disk array without raid (metadata in
raid10, but data in single), and one of the disks just died.
So I lost some of my data, ok, I knew that.
But two question :
*
Is it possible to know (using metadata I suppose) what data I have
lost ?
*
Is it
