btrfs-delalloc - threaded?

2011-09-06 Thread Andrew Carlson
Hi all. I was doing some testing with writing out data to a BTFS filesystem with the compress-force option. With 1 program running, I saw btfs-delalloc taking about 1 CPU worth of time, much as could be expected. I then started up 2 programs at the same time, writing data to the BTRFS volume. b

Fix for rm -r

2010-04-09 Thread Andrew Carlson
The latest unstable git pull fixed a little problem I had with rm -r. With a filled up filesystem, rm -rwould stop after a few minutes say "filesystem full', but a subsequent rm -r would clear the filesystem. Now, it acts as it should, and removed all the files and directories the first time. --

Re: btrfs error: 'disk full' although 8 of 21 GB free

2010-04-07 Thread Andrew Carlson
I can tell you from experience that the later unstable git pull works much better in this regard. I have a 299GB filesystem compressed to 1.2TB full with 507M free. And it handles the ENOSPC condition like it should. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at

BTRFS Oops during dbench

2010-02-27 Thread Andrew Carlson
Linux kernel 2.6.33 mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -L storage -m raid1 /dev/sdg2 /dev/sdh2 /dev/sdi2 /dev/sdj2 mount -t btrfs -o thread_pool=8,noatime /dev/sdg2 /storage running dbench with 512 processes Please see attached dmesg output. The system stayed up, but the disk stopped responding. -- Andy Carlso

BTRFS: Newer version available:

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Carlson
I was wondering if there is a newer BTRFS version floating around somewhere. The version tag on the one I got from git is "Btrfs v2.6.27-rc7-59199-g3f6fae9", which seems kinda old, even though the kernel is 2.6.32. Thanks, and sorry for the newbie question, but the git unstable is the only place