It looks like [1] and [2] didn't make it into 3.8 and are not in 3.8.2,
nor the queue [3]. Can somebody forward them to stable, if they are
appropriate? I think these are the proper commits:
925396e Btrfs: account for orphan inodes properly during cleanup
4a7d0f6 Btrfs: cleanup orphan
On 03/06/2013 07:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. awkward silence
Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical
order.
Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of
super_block and thus a freshly created
On 02/28/2013 10:35 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:31:15AM -0700, Daniel Kozák wrote:
Dne Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:47:21 +0100 Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
napsal(a):
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 03:59:35PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 02/27/2013 02:08 PM, Josef Bacik wrote
On 02/28/2013 12:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Ok so now that I have it reproducing, how do I go about getting a custom kernel
on there? I'm used to libvirt where all the networking stuff is done for me,
this doesn't seem to connect to the network at all and it also doesn't seem to
have mount.nfs
On 02/27/2013 02:08 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Kozák kozz...@gmail.com wrote:
[kozzi@KozziFX ~]$ mkdir derby
[kozzi@KozziFX ~]$ cd derby/
[kozzi@KozziFX derby]$ wget -c -q
On 02/25/2013 06:30 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
From: Wang Shilong wangsl-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
As we implement the strict hierarchy quota in the userspace,
it is sufficient to check this ruler in the userspace.remove
the special check for qgroup 0.
I haven't done any kernel coding so I'm curious,
On 02/11/2013 05:08 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:21:16AM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote:
Running an Ubuntu Raring VM which was built a week ago that is now running
3.8-rc6, I was booting it last night when it hung. After a few forced
reboots, it came back up and I found
On 02/21/2013 08:01 AM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
Hi Calvin,
I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come with kernel 3.7 in April.
On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Blair Zajac bl...@orcaware.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying btrfs in a VirtualBox VM running Ubuntu 11.10 with kernel 3.0.0.
Running fsck I get a message with err is 1.
Does this mean there's an error
On Nov 23, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Stephane CHAZELAS wrote:
Hiya,
is there any recommendation out there to setup a btrfs FS on top
of hardware or software raid5 or raid6 wrt stripe/stride alignment?
Isn't the advantage of having btrfs do all the raiding itself so one gets the
checksums? If one
Hello,
I'm trying btrfs in a VirtualBox VM running Ubuntu 11.10 with kernel 3.0.0.
Running fsck I get a message with err is 1.
root@ubuntu-11-10-i386:/# fsck -v -v /
fsck from util-linux 2.19.1
root 257 inode 878 errors 400
found 6938783744 bytes used err is 1
total csum bytes: 6281436
total
11 matches
Mail list logo
