On 03/30/2017 09:35 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
<>
> Yeah, I imagine we'd need a on-disk change for this unless there's
> something already present that we could use in place of a crash counter.
>
Perhaps we can use s_mtime and/or s_wtime in some way, I'm not sure
what is a parallel for that in xfs.
On 09/09/2015 02:28 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-09-08 16:00, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
<>
> this may actually make things slower (the particular effect of SSD mode
> is that it tries to spread allocations out as much as possible, as this
> helps with wear-leveling
On 09/09/2015 03:40 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-09-09 08:12, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 09/09/2015 02:28 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-08 16:00, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
>> <>
>>
>>> this may actually mak
On 12/02/2014 02:58 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 28-11-14 13:14:21, Ted Tso wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 06:23:23PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Hum, when someone calls fsync() for an inode, you likely want to sync
timestamps to disk even if everything else is clean. I think that doing
what you did
On 11/25/2014 06:33 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I was concerned about putting them on the dirty inode list because it
would be extra inodes for the writeback threads would have to skip
over and ignore (since they would not be dirty in the inde or data
pages sense).
Another solution would be
On 05/25/2012 06:35 PM, Alexander Block wrote:
Hello,
(this is a resend with proper CC for linux-fsdevel and linux-kernel)
I would like to start a discussion on atime in Btrfs (and other
filesystems with snapshot support).
As atime is updated on every access of a file or directory, we
On 11/23/2010 12:02 PM, Nick Piggin wrote:
Taking s_umount lock inside i_mutex can result in an ABBA deadlock:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.37-rc3+ #26
On 11/23/2010 12:54 PM, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
*
* Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
* Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
+ *
+ * Even if 1 is returned, writeback may not be started
On 07/24/2010 12:17 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have
not been resolved, please speak up.
Hi Christoph --
Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply!
Anything
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 08:20 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You made it back into the locked version.
Btw, even if you probably had some reason for this, one thing to note is
that I think Chris' performance testing showed that the
10 matches
Mail list logo
