Same thing here.
I've tried really hard, but even after 12 hours I wasn't able to get a
single warning from btrfs.
I think you cracked it!
Thanks,
Christian
2012/5/24 Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com:
Hi,
the ceph cluster is running under heavy load for the last 13 hours without a
2012/5/22 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
Yeah you would also need to change orphan_meta_reserved. I fixed this by just
taking the BTRFS_I(inode)-lock when messing with these since we don't want to
take up all that space in the inode just for a marker. I ran this patch for 3
hours with no
2012/5/21 Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi Josef,
On fri, 18 May 2012 15:01:05 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 9b9b15f..492c74f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct
2012/5/17 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:12:55PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
Hi Josef,
no there was nothing above. Here the is another dmesg output.
Hrm ok give this a try and hopefully this is it, still couldn't reproduce.
Thanks,
Josef
Well, I hate to say it,
2012/5/10 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:02:08PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Am 24. April 2012 18:26 schrieb Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
After running
2012/5/3 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:38:27AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 11:20:53 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:17:43AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
Yeah all that was in the right place, I rebooted and I
2012/4/29 tsuna tsuna...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Christian Brunner
christ...@brunner-muc.de wrote:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch and big metadata
is much better.
I've heard
Am 24. April 2012 18:26 schrieb Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch
Am 20. April 2012 17:09 schrieb Christian Brunner christ...@brunner-muc.de:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch and big metadata
is much better. The only problem (?) I'm still seeing is a warning
that seems
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch and big metadata
is much better. The only problem (?) I'm still seeing is a warning
that seems to occur from time to time:
[87703.784552] [ cut here ]
2012/2/24 Nik Markovic nmarkovi.nav...@gmail.com:
To add... I also tried nodatasum (only) and nodatacow otions. I found
somewhere that nodatacow doesn't really mean tthat COW is disabled.
Test data is still the same - CPU spikes and times are the same.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Nik
2012/1/23 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:19:29PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:13:37PM +0100, Christian Brunner wrote:
As you might know, I have been seeing btrfs slowdowns in our ceph
cluster for quite some time. Even with the latest
As you might know, I have been seeing btrfs slowdowns in our ceph
cluster for quite some time. Even with the latest btrfs code for 3.3
I'm still seeing these problems. To make things reproducible, I've now
written a small test, that imitates ceph's behavior:
On a freshly created btrfs filesystem
2012/1/7 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2012/1/5 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:12:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:45:00PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:46:57PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Unfortunately
2012/1/5 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:12:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:45:00PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:46:57PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:01:22AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
Sorry - I forgot to mention, that I'm still seeing this with:
[PATCH] Btrfs: update global block_rsv when creating a new block group
Christian
2011/12/13 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
Hi,
with the latest btrfs for-linus I'm seeing seeing occasional
btrfs_alloc_free_block warnings
2011/12/12 Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br:
On Dec 7, 2011, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
With this patch applied I get much higher write-io values than without
it. Some of the other patches help to reduce the effect, but it's
still significant.
iostat on an unpatched node
2011/12/12 Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br:
It was pointed out to me that the test for enough free space in a block
group was wrong in that it would skip a block group that had most of its
free space reserved by a cluster.
I offer two mutually exclusive, (so far) very lightly tested
2011/12/7 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/12/1 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/12/1 Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br:
On Nov 29, 2011, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
When I'm doing havy reading in our ceph cluster. The load and wait-io
on the patched servers is higher
2011/12/1 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/12/1 Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br:
On Nov 29, 2011, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
When I'm doing havy reading in our ceph cluster. The load and wait-io
on the patched servers is higher than on the unpatched ones.
That's
2011/11/28 Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br:
We're failing to create clusters with bitmaps because
setup_cluster_no_bitmap checks that the list is empty before inserting
the bitmap entry in the list for setup_cluster_bitmap, but the list
field is only initialized when it is restored
2011/11/26 Stefan Kleijkers ste...@unilogicnetworks.net:
Hello Josef,
I've new results, is this the trace you are looking for?
Trace of OSD0: http://pastebin.com/gddLBXE4
Dmesg of OSD0: http://pastebin.com/Uebzgkjv
OSD1 crashed a while later with the same messages.
Stefan
Hi Josef,
I
2011/11/16 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:19:53AM +0100, Christian Brunner wrote:
Hi,
this time I've hit a new bug. This happened while ceph was rebuilding
his filestore (heavy io).
The btrfs version is from 3.2-rc1, applied to a 3.0 kernel.
This one means
Hi,
this time I've hit a new bug. This happened while ceph was rebuilding
his filestore (heavy io).
The btrfs version is from 3.2-rc1, applied to a 3.0 kernel.
Regards,
Christian
[28981.550478] [ cut here ]
[28981.555625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1587!
2011/11/9 Stefan Kleijkers ste...@unilogicnetworks.net:
Hello,
I'm seeing a lot of warnings in dmesg with a BTRFS filesystem. I'm using the
3.1 kernel, I found a patch for these warnings (
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=131547325515336w=2)
2011/10/31 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/10/31 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
The patch didn't hurt, but I've to tell you that I'm still seeing the
same old problems. Load is going up again:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5502 root 20 0
2011/10/31 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/10/31 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/10/31 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
The patch didn't hurt, but I've to tell you that I'm still seeing the
same old problems. Load is going up again:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM
2011/10/27 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:56:48PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/24 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
Josef, Chris, any ideas on the below issues
2011/10/26 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
Christian, have you tweaked those settings in your ceph.conf? It would
be
something like 'journal dio = false'. If not, can you verify that
directio shows true when the journal is initialized from
2011/10/26 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Attached
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:56:48PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/24 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
Josef, Chris, any ideas on the below issues
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:56:48PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
[...]
In our Ceph-OSD server we have 4 disks with 4 btrfs filesystems
2011/10/25 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Josef Bacik wrote:
At this point it seems like the biggest problem with latency in ceph-osd
is not related to btrfs, the latency seems to all be from the fact that
ceph-osd is fsyncing a block dev for whatever reason.
There is one
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Attached is a perf-report. I have included the whole
2011/10/24 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:51:47PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
Josef, Chris, any ideas on the below issues?
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote
2011/10/20 Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com:
On 10/17/2011 11:23 PM, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/11 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
I have updated to a 3.0.6 kernel, with all the btrfs patches from
josef's git repo this weekend. But I'm still seeing the following
warning:
Hi,
Would
2011/10/11 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/10/11 Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com:
On 10/10/2011 12:41 AM, Christian Brunner wrote:
I just realized that this is still the same warning I reported some month
ago.
I thought that this had been fixed
2011/10/13 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
[...]
[ 175.956273] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2176!
Ok I think I see what's happening, this patch replaces the previous one,
let me
know how it goes. Thanks,
Getting a slightly different BUG this time:
Ok looks like I've fixed the
2011/10/11 Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com:
On 10/10/2011 12:41 AM, Christian Brunner wrote:
I just realized that this is still the same warning I reported some month
ago.
I thought that this had been fixed with
25d37af374263243214be9d912cbb46a8e469bc7
which is included in the kernel I'm
I just realized that this is still the same warning I reported some month ago.
I thought that this had been fixed with
25d37af374263243214be9d912cbb46a8e469bc7
which is included in the kernel I'm using. So I think there must be
another Problem.
Regards,
Christian
2011/10/9 Christian Brunner c
Christian
2011/8/8 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
Hi Christian,
Are you still seeing this slowness?
sage
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/7/25 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
Excerpts from Christian Brunner's message of 2011-07-25 03:54:47 -0400:
Hi,
we are running
2011/7/28 Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com:
Christian,
Have you checked up on the disks themselves and hardware? High
utilization can mean that the i/o load has increased, but it can also
mean that the i/o capacity has decreased. Your traces seem to
indicate that a good portion of the
Hi,
we are running a ceph cluster with btrfs as it's base filesystem
(kernel 3.0). At the beginning everything worked very well, but after
a few days (2-3) things are getting very slow.
When I look at the object store servers I see heavy disk-i/o on the
btrfs filesystems (disk utilization is
2011/7/18 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 07/18/2011 02:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every
extent
we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW
once,
and then everybody else is ok. Unfortunately
I'm running a Ceph Object Store with 3.0-rc7 and patches from Josef.
Occasionally I get the attached warning.
Everything seems to be working after this warning, but I am concerned...
Thanks,
Christian
[13319.808020] [ cut here ]
[13319.813284] WARNING: at
2011/7/13 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 07/12/2011 11:20 AM, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box
2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box
This is because use_block_rsv() is having to do a
reserve_metadata_bytes(), which shouldn't
Hi,
we are running a ceph cluster with a btrfs store. Last night we ran
across this btrfs BUG.
Any hints on how to solve this are welcome.
Regards
Christian
May 19 06:10:07 os00 kernel: [247212.342712] [ cut here
]
May 19 06:10:07 os00 kernel: [247212.347953] kernel BUG
2011/5/3 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 05/03/2011 12:44 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
If posix_acl_from_xattr() returns an error code, a negative address is
dereferenced causing an oops; fix by checking for error code first.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Bluemandaniel.blue...@gmail.com
---
49 matches
Mail list logo
