Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck

2013-04-15 Thread Dan McGrath
d filesystem, see btrfsck(8). Note the "p" and "a" switches when called with custom fs switches, but not when called standalone. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 4/15/13 11:45 AM, Dan McGrath wrote: >> Jan, >> >> I got a chance

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck

2013-04-15 Thread Dan McGrath
eplies! o/ Dan On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Dan McGrath wrote: >> As per FAQ: It is safe to and recommended to turn fsck.btrfs into a no-op >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan McGrath >> --- >> bt

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck

2013-04-15 Thread Dan McGrath
d a symlink name of 'fsck.btrfsck', instead of 'fsck.btrfs'. As for fsck.xfs, I will take a look, thanks! On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Dan McGrath wrote: > > As per FAQ: It is safe to and recom

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck

2013-04-15 Thread Dan McGrath
As per FAQ: It is safe to and recommended to turn fsck.btrfs into a no-op Signed-off-by: Dan McGrath --- btrfs.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/btrfs.c b/btrfs.c index 691adef..78161a9 100644 --- a/btrfs.c +++ b/btrfs.c @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ int main(int argc, char

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck

2013-04-15 Thread Dan McGrath
/true. PS - Apologies if I mess this git send-email up! Dan McGrath (1): btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck btrfs.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message