Re: btrfs-progs: integration branch updated

2011-07-01 Thread Daniel Witzel
Just wanted to say thank you Hugo for doing this. The latest patch set may of not fixed my problem, but it is still nice to be able to see the progress being made to btrfs-progs in one area. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to

Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Witzel
Thanks for the reply. copied the patch from the line diff onward did a fresh kernel tree and got the following (same on 2.6.39-r1 and r2) localhost linux# patch -p1 --dry-run --verbose disk-io.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was:

Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Witzel
Thanks for the reply, Copied the patch from the diff line onwards and patched against a fresh kernel 2.6.39-r1 and r2 tree with same result: localhost linux # patch --dry-run --verbose -p1 disk-io.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was:

Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Witzel
well here is what I,m doing: patch -p1 disk-io.patch output: patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c rmmod btrfs rmmod lzo_compress make -j3 make -j3 modules make -j3 modules_install cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/linux-next depmod -a (reboot) modprobe btrfs btrfs device scan btrfs filesystem

Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Witzel
I'm game for trying it, been waiting a good bit to recover, and i have spare drives to save the data to. Just post the git link for it if it's different then Chris Masons git tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to

Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Witzel
Well still no cigar, didnt even change the error output. Thank you though for at least trying to help. here goes the error info with your patch applied to /fs/btrfs/disk-io.c: mount -o ro /dev/sdf1 (same for c1,d1,etc) /btrfs (dmesg output) [ 1647.330104] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 1683.328038]

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

2011-06-22 Thread Daniel Witzel
Well, I'm patient. Rather have a fsck that works than a fsck that may thrash the FS so no 'gun to the head' on this one. Some feedback on RECENT progress would be nice. Besides your merge branch Hugo (yes I tried it still no cigar...) it's been ghost since December 2010. -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

2011-06-21 Thread Daniel Witzel
Welcome to the club, I have a similar issue. We pretty much have to wait for the fsck tool to finish being developed. If possible unhook the drives and leave them be until the tool is done. I don't know when it will be done as I am not a developer, mearly a follower. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: New btrfsck status

2011-06-13 Thread Daniel Witzel
Same here, got 5TB in suspense, running btfs-progs-unstable, also tried the new hugo patches. Kernel 2.6.39-r1 gentoo box error from mount /dev/sdf1 /server, or btrfsck -s 0,1,2,etc /dev/sdd1: parent transid verify failed on 2206281838592 wanted 2135 found 1545 btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: