tponly/eira-receive/log/snapshot-2015-05-21T09.52.59N3f.far.lzo
| btrfs receive -C $PWD
Chroot to /mnt/snapshots/eira/log
At snapshot snapshot-2015-05-21T09.52.59N3f
ERROR: failed to open
/snapshots/eira/log/snapshot-2015-05-15T17.00.28N1f/journal/1d6156a06c4a45feaef97336a4b154b8/use
> mount -t btrfs /dev/vdb /test
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/vdb,
>missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>dmesg | tail or so
IIRC you need mount option degraded here.
--
To unsubs
> In my case, I'm unable to reproduce the problem. I get the same sha256sum of
> an existing 16M journal file (in the read only snapshot) as I do in the
> send/received snapshot. The difference is the original is compromised of 1976
> extents, while the received is in a single extent.
Was the s
> Emil, your bug report mentions the subvolume journal is different, and
> not anything about silent content differences on file data (images,
> databases, etc.) as you mention above. How are they related?
systemd-journald is a logging daemon in the userspace that has nothing
to do with filesyste
There are also silent content missmatches on some subset of files that
are not linearly written (vm images, databases and such).
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66941
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.ke
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pedro Fonseca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In another test, I've encountered a few situations that triggered a warning
> message in "record_one_backref()". I'm not sure if it's serious but it is
> probably related to the concurrent defragment operations executed during the
> t
This fixes static compile target of btrfs-progs.
Signed-off-by: Emil Karlson
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 4e33648..4604b1f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ CFLAGS = -g -O1
objects = ctree.o disk
Greetings
Btrfs-progs static compile fails due to multiple uuid-tree.o in
linking paratemeters:
build error:
gcc -g -O1 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -o btrfs.static
btrfs.static.o help.static.o cmds-subvolume.static.o
cmds-filesystem.static.o cmds-device.static.o cmds-scrub.static.o
cmd
> If the filesystem is clever enough to know that the range in question has
> not been written to since the last discard, then it takes no action, and
> reports zero bytes.
File system images can be rewritten on a new media so there is a
drawback to that.
Best Regards
-Emil
--
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Emil Karlson wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Send fails for me unexpectedly:
>
> I get:
> ERROR: rename o262-5-0 -> snapshots failed. No such file or directory
>
> reproducer ( http://users.tkk.fi/~jkarlson/files/test4.txt ):
>
> f
Greetings
Send fails for me unexpectedly:
I get:
ERROR: rename o262-5-0 -> snapshots failed. No such file or directory
reproducer ( http://users.tkk.fi/~jkarlson/files/test4.txt ):
for i in 1 2; do
mkdir /mnt/$i
truncate -s 4G /mnt/$i.img
mkfs.btrfs /mnt/$i.img
mount -o loop /mnt/$i.im
Greetings
Encountered this bug on linux-3.11-rc2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60608
Best Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
12 matches
Mail list logo
