2013/10/14 Josef Bacik :
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 07:03:12PM -0300, Geyslan Gregório Bem wrote:
>> 2013/10/11 Stefan Behrens :
>> > On 10/11/2013 20:35, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In add_inode_ref() function:
>> >>
>> >> Ini
2013/10/11 Stefan Behrens :
> On 10/11/2013 20:35, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>>
>> In add_inode_ref() function:
>>
>> Initializes local pointers.
>>
>> Reduces the logical condition with the __add_inode_ref() return
>> value by using only one 'goto out'.
>>
>> Centralizes the exiting, ensuring the free
2013/10/11 Stefan Behrens :
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:11:22 -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> In add_inode_ref() function:
>>
>> Initializes local pointers.
>>
>> Reduces the logical condition with the __add_inode_ref() return
>> value by using only one 'goto out'.
>>
>> Centralizes the exiting, ensur
Josef,
Thank you. Sending v4.
Geyslan Gregório Bem
hackingbits.com
2013/10/9 Josef Bacik :
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:40:30PM -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> In some cases, add_inode_ref() is returning without freeing
>> the 'name' pointer.
>>
>> Added b
Please,
Analyze [PATCH v3].
Regards,
Geyslan Gregório Bem
hackingbits.com
2013/10/9 Geyslan G. Bem :
> In some cases, add_inode_ref() is returning without freeing
> the 'name' pointer.
>
> Added bail out to explicitly call kfree when necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Felipe, thank you,
Sending v2.
Geyslan Gregório Bem
hackingbits.com
2013/10/9 Felipe Pena :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> In some cases, add_inode_ref() is returning without freeing
>> the 'name' pointer.
>>
>> A