sed database), but I think there is enough need.
my 2 cents,
Heinz-Josef Claes
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 09:27:15 you wrote:
> On 17/03/2010 01:45, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 March 2010 10:21:43 David Brown wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I was wondering i
On Tue, 5 May 2009 07:29:45 +1000
Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
> > Hi, during the last half year I thought a little bit about doing dedup for
> > my backup program: not only with fixed blocks (which is implemented), but
> &g
Thomas Glanzmann schrieb:
Ric,
I would not categorize it as offline, but just not as inband (i.e., you can
run a low priority background process to handle dedup).
Offline windows are extremely rare in production sites these days and
it could take a very long time to do dedup at th
Am Dienstag, 28. April 2009 22:16:19 schrieb Thomas Glanzmann:
> Hello Heinz,
>
> > It's not only cpu time, it's also memory. You need 32 byte for each 4k
> > block. It needs to be in RAM for performance reason.
>
> exactly and that is not going to scale.
>
> Thomas
Hi Thomas,
I wrote a
Am Dienstag, 28. April 2009 19:38:24 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:34 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I wouldn't rely on crc32: it is not a strong hash,
> > > Such deduplication can lead to various problems,
> > > including security ones.
> >
> > sure thing, di
