Re: btrfs-tools/linux 4.11: btrfs-cleaner misbehaving

2017-05-28 Thread Ivan P
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > [This mail was also posted to gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs.] > > Ivan P posted on Sat, 27 May 2017 22:54:31 +0200 as excerpted: > >>>>>> Please add me to CC when replying, as I am not &

Re: btrfs-tools/linux 4.11: btrfs-cleaner misbehaving

2017-05-27 Thread Ivan P
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > On 05/27/2017 10:29 PM, Ivan P wrote: >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Hans van Kranenburg >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 05/27/2017 08:53 PM, Ivan P wrote: >>>> >>>

Re: btrfs-tools/linux 4.11: btrfs-cleaner misbehaving

2017-05-27 Thread Ivan P
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/27/2017 08:53 PM, Ivan P wrote: >> >> for a while now, btrfs-cleaner has been molesting my system's btrfs >> partition, >> as well as my CPU. The behavior is as following: &g

btrfs-tools/linux 4.11: btrfs-cleaner misbehaving

2017-05-27 Thread Ivan P
Hello, for a while now, btrfs-cleaner has been molesting my system's btrfs partition, as well as my CPU. The behavior is as following: After booting, nothing relevant is happening. After about 5-30 minutes, a btrfs-cleaner process is spawned, which is constantly using one CPU core. The btrfs-clea

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support to clear v1 free space cache for btrfs check

2016-05-22 Thread Ivan P
sion. Regards, Ivan. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > Ivan P wrote on 2016/05/19 18:54 +0200: >> >> Not sure why I was so fixated on installing it - thanks for reminding. >> >> I was able to run it, but it fails: >> ===

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support to clear v1 free space cache for btrfs check

2016-05-19 Thread Ivan P
t you don't really need to install the > patch. > > You can just execute '/btrfsck' directly to > call the new fsck. > > And there is still some time before the patch is merged, there is really no > need to install. > > Thanks, > Qu > > > Ivan

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support to clear v1 free space cache for btrfs check

2016-05-17 Thread Ivan P
ue, May 17, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Also to Ivan P, the initial reporter of the problem. > > Now "btrfsck --clear-cache" should help you to prevent kernel warning on > free space cache problem. > > Thanks, > Qu > > Qu Wenruo wrote on 2016/05/17 11:47 +

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-05-06 Thread Ivan P
Issue persists with btrfs-progs 4.5.1 and linux 4.5.1. Did you have time to implement that option in btrfsck you were talking about? I'm a bit reluctant to use this partition at this point. Regards Ivan On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Ivan P wrote: > Feel free to send me that modified

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-04-12 Thread Ivan P
cache in case > kernel mount option doesn't work, and hopes it may help you. > > Thanks, > Qu > > > Ivan P wrote on 2016/04/09 11:53 +0200: >> >> Well, the message is almost the same after mounting with clear_cach

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-04-09 Thread Ivan P
, then that's maybe it. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > Ivan P wrote on 2016/04/07 17:33 +0200: >> >> After running btrfsck --readonly again, the output is: >> >> === >> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-04-07 Thread Ivan P
: 858788433920 referenced 858787872768 === Seems the free space is wrong because more data blocks are allocated than referenced? Regards, Ivan. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > Ivan P wrote on 2016/04/06 21:39 +0200: >> >&g

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-04-06 Thread Ivan P
30332/image.btrfs (821Mb) Maybe you will be able to track down whatever caused this. Regards, Ivan. On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 04/03/2016 12:29 AM, Ivan P wrote: >> >> It's about 800Mb, I think I could upload that. >> >> I ran it with

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-04-02 Thread Ivan P
It's about 800Mb, I think I could upload that. I ran it with the -s parameter, is that enough to remove all personal info from the image? Also, I had to run it with -w because otherwise it died on the same corrupt node. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > Ivan P

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-03-28 Thread Ivan P
repair? Regards, Ivan On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > Ivan P wrote on 2016/03/27 16:31 +0200: >> >> Thanks for the reply, >> >> the raid1 array was created from scratch, so not converted from ext*. >> I used btrfs-progs version 4.2.3 o

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-03-27 Thread Ivan P
..forgot to paste btrfs-version: 4.4.1 (slightly outdated, but it's the current version on arch linux) On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Ivan P wrote: > Read the info on the wiki, here's the rest of the requested information: > > # uname -r > 4.4.5-1-ARCH > > # btrfs

Re: scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-03-27 Thread Ivan P
iB, used=799.81GiB System, RAID1: total=8.00MiB, used=128.00KiB Metadata, RAID1: total=2.00GiB, used=936.20MiB GlobalReserve, single: total=320.00MiB, used=0.00B On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ivan P wrote: > Hello, > > using kernel 4.4.5 and btrfs-progs 4.4.1, I today ran a scrub on m

scrub: Tree block spanning stripes, ignored

2016-03-25 Thread Ivan P
Hello, using kernel 4.4.5 and btrfs-progs 4.4.1, I today ran a scrub on my 2x1Tb btrfs raid1 array and it finished with 36 unrecoverable errors [1], all blaming the treeblock 741942071296. Running "btrfs check --readonly" on one of the devices lists that extent as corrupted [2]. How can I recove