Re: "no space left on device" from tar on ppc64le

e new SD cards 2 weeks ago. I used the exact same script on kernel 5.1.x and the problem did not come up again, ie I was able to untar without the hack to slow down write speed. Thanks to Btrfs developpers! Best regards, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Poly

Re: Untar on empty partition returns ENOSPACE

ay with my simple script for this project. Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française https://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.797.527

Re: Untar on empty partition returns ENOSPACE

Le 17/10/2018 à 20:43, Henk Slager a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:04 AM Jean-Denis Girard wrote: > This looks like to have a similar root cause as this: > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg81536.html Yes, seems similar. > For 50 clones, you cou

Untar on empty partition returns ENOSPACE

v4.17.1 Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française https://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.797.527

Re: Mount error on 32 bits, ok on 64 bits

Le 02/10/2017 à 11:46, Goffredo Baroncelli a écrit : > On 10/02/2017 07:59 PM, Jean-Denis Girard wrote: >> Le 30/09/2017 à 17:29, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : >>> Le 28/09/2017 à 19:26, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : >>> The problem seems to come from commit c821e7f3 "p

Re: Mount error on 32 bits, ok on 64 bits

Le 30/09/2017 à 17:29, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : > Le 28/09/2017 à 19:26, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : > The problem seems to come from commit c821e7f3 "pass bytes to > btrfs_bio_alloc" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9763081/): the > system is now running fine on 4.13.

Re: Mount error on 32 bits, ok on 64 bits

Le 28/09/2017 à 19:26, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : > Le 28/09/2017 à 15:29, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : > FWIW, kernels up to 4.12.14 are ok, and 4.13-rc1 has the same probem. > Which patches should I try to reverse first? The problem seems to come from commit c821e7f3 "

Re: Mount error on 32 bits, ok on 64 bits

Le 28/09/2017 à 15:29, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : > Hi list, > > I have an Alix motherboard with a SD card using btrfs running fine since > 2010. Today, I wanted to upgrade to kernel 4.13.4 from 4.9.52 (i586). As > always, I cross-compiled from my main system, installed on A

Mount error on 32 bits, ok on 64 bits

ried:    btrfs   Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(8,1) Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française https://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.797.527 # # Automatically generated fi

Re: btrfs-tools/linux 4.11: btrfs-cleaner misbehaving

p://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg58111.html It seems to be related to autodefrag, rebooting without autodefrag, manually defragmenting, and rebooting again with autodefrag worked for me. Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux SystèmesLinuxen Polynésie française http://w

Re: spinning kworker with space_cache=v2 searching for free space

The problem disappeared after manually defragmenting all volumes. Regards, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française https://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.797.527 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li

Re: Stuck btrfs-cleaner on 4.7 and 4.6

Le 21/08/2016 à 17:39, Jean-Denis Girard a écrit : > Hi list, > > After upgrading my Fedora 23 system from 4.4.12 to 4.7.2, I'm seeing one > btrfs-cleaner process stuck at 100% CPU. The problem disappears when > going back to 4.4 kernel (4.4.17), but is also present with Fedor

Stuck btrfs-cleaner on 4.7 and 4.6

btrfs (rw,noatime,nodiratime,seclabel,compress=zlib,ssd,space_cache,autodefrag,skip_balance,subvolid=1074,subvol=/cathy) /dev/bcache0 on /home/Musique type btrfs (rw,noatime,nodiratime,seclabel,compress=zlib,ssd,space_cache,autodefrag,skip_balance,subvolid=961,subvol=/Musique) Thanks, -- Jean-De

Snapshots diff

will find this useful. Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française http://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.79.75.27 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fallback to vmalloc in btrfs_compare_tree

Hi David, Le 30/03/2016 04:05, David Sterba a écrit : > The allocation of node could fail if the memory is too fragmented for a > given node size, practically observed with 64k. > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/54689 > > Reported-by: Jean-Denis Girar

Re: btrfs: page allocation failure

Hi David, Le 30/03/2016 03:50, David Sterba a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:04:10PM -1000, Jean-Denis Girard wrote: >> >> [ 3734.651439] btrfs: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x2404040 > > Order 4 is 64k, and most probably it's the allocation of a nodesi

btrfs: page allocation failure

.651775] 0 pages cma reserved [ 3734.651776] 0 pages hwpoisoned What should I do to avoid this? Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française http://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.797.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send t

Re: Undelete files / directory

a new page? Thanks, Jean-Denis Girard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Undelete files / directory

--- $i " btrfs restore -v -f $i --path-regex '^/(|jdg(|/tmp(|/.*)))$' \ ../x220_home.img . done And I now have back my ~2800 photos (~13 Gb). Many thanks to those who helped! Best regards, Jean-Denis Girard Le 30/08/2014 10:12, Jean-Denis Girard a

Re: Undelete files / directory

Le 28/08/2014 21:40, Konstantinos Skarlatos a écrit : > On 28/8/2014 8:04 μμ, Jean-Denis Girard wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for your detailed answer. >> >> Le 28/08/2014 06:25, Chris Murphy a écrit : >>> 9. btrfs-find-root /dev/sdc >>> Sup

Re: Undelete files / directory

#x27;s the tree root is at 115230801920, chunk root 131072 Went past the fs size, exiting[jdg@tiare tmp]$ Thanks, Jean-Denis Girard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Undelete files / directory

st? I made a dump of the device to another computer (using dd), I think the data are still here (hexedit). What else could I try? Thanks, Jean-Denis Girard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org

Re: Undelete files / directory

9 > level 0 Here is what the command returns : [root@x220 ~]# btrfs-find-root /dev/mapper/home Super think's the tree root is at 115230801920, chunk root 131072 Went past the fs size, exiting[root@x220 ~]# I just tried with latest btrfs-progs (from git), it returns exactly the same. The btr

Undelete files / directory

broken file system, just a normally deleted directory. I'm on Fedora 20, with kernel 3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64, and btrfs-progs-3.14.2-3.fc20.x86_64. Thanks, - -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux SystèmesLinuxen Polynésie française http://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.