Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2015-06-02 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > On 05/26/2015 08:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Chris Mason wrote: >>> Hi Linus, >>> >>> My for-linus-4.1 branch has three more fixes: >>> >>> git://git.ker

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2015-05-26 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > Hi Linus, > > My for-linus-4.1 branch has three more fixes: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git > for-linus-4.1 > > I fixed up a regression from 4.0 where conversion between different raid > levels would som

Re: Please add 9c4f61f01d269815bb7c37be3ede59c5587747c6 to stable

2015-04-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 07:28:38PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote: >>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:17:47 -0400 >>> Chris Mason wrote: >>> >>> > Hi stable friends, >>> > >>> > Can you please backport

Re: Btrfs lockdep with 3.15 merge window v3.14-751-g683b6c6f82a6

2014-04-02 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, David Sterba wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 06:23:11PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> Below is a lockdep spew I have on a local VM running Linus' tree as of >>> this aftern

Re: Btrfs lockdep with 3.15 merge window v3.14-751-g683b6c6f82a6

2014-04-02 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 06:23:11PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Below is a lockdep spew I have on a local VM running Linus' tree as of >> this afternoon. The specific git commit is v3.14-751-g683b6c6f82a6. > >&g

Btrfs lockdep with 3.15 merge window v3.14-751-g683b6c6f82a6

2014-04-01 Thread Josh Boyer
Hi Chris and Josef, Below is a lockdep spew I have on a local VM running Linus' tree as of this afternoon. The specific git commit is v3.14-751-g683b6c6f82a6. I don't believe any btrfs commits have been merged for 3.15 in this kernel. The only related commits seem to be the merge of Ingo's core

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-09-13 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Russell King wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:53:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> I'm not an ARM expert, so I don't know if ARM should use the >>> asm-generic im

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-09-13 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Russell King wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:53:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> I'm not an ARM expert, so I don't know if ARM should use the >> asm-generic implementations, or just use __get_user/__put_user in all >> cases. I&

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-09-13 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Josh Boyer > wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Chris Mason >> wrote: >>> Mark Fasheh (4): >>> btrfs: offline dedupe >> >> This commit

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-09-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > Mark Fasheh (4): > btrfs: offline dedupe This commit adds calls to __put_user_unaligned, which causes build failures on ARM if btrfs is configured: + make -s ARCH=arm V=1 -j4 modules fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl_file_exte

Re: [build breakage] Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull round two

2011-08-19 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Chris Mason wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> This has the rest of the btrfs cleanups for 3.1.  The bulk of this is >> error handing fixes from SUSE and cleanups from Fujitsu. > > I havent seen a lkml mail of this pull request: > >  5c80c71b9