Michael Duell rub.de> writes:
>
> Hallo Lubos!
>
> I have got the same problems with send/receive. Had those problems
> for several weeks or months now. Not sure when those started.
>
> These send/receive problems are known and there are several bug
> reports all over the internet and also on
Hello,
I am having strange issue with btrfs send/receive:
#btrfs send -p /mnt/a/_btrbk_snap/debian.20160621_1
/mnt/a/_btrbk_snap/debian.20160622 | btrfs receive
/mnt/ext/backups/vaclfw/
At subvol /mnt/a/_btrbk_snap/debian.20160622
At snapshot debian.20160622
ERROR: unlink var/lib/samba/priva
Martin Steigerwald, Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:10:42 +0100:
> Am Samstag, 24. März 2012 schrieb Lubos Kolouch:
>> Hello,
>
> Hi Lubos,
>
>> I have a (rather historical btrfs) filesystem running here.
>> When I run scrub, I get a lot of messages like :
>> btrfs: che
Hello,
I have a (rather historical btrfs) filesystem running here.
When I run scrub, I get a lot of messages like :
btrfs: checksum error at logical 2153033760768 on dev /dev/md2, sector
492918400, root 5232, inode 3360637, offset 217088, length 4096, links 1
(path: )
and
btrfs: unable to
Dmitry Olenin, Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:03:39 +0900:
> On 11/09/2011 04:48 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Sorry for possibly OT question - when I have historical btrfs system
>> mounted with zlib compression,
>>
>> can I remount it with lzo ? What will happen? Will the COW
dima, Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:01:13 +0900:
> On 11/09/2011 12:12 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:00:42AM +0900, dima wrote:
On 11/08/2011 10:54 AM, Eric Griffith wrote:
> On 11/7/2011 8:52 PM, Fajar A. Nugra
Li Zefan, Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:44:31 +0800:
I've been monitoring the lists for a while now but didn't see this
problem mentioned in particular: I've got a fairly standard desktop
system at home, 700gb WD drive, nothing special, with 2 btrfs
filesystems and some snapshots. The sy
if this issue is known/identified. If
>> not then I'll need to make someone do some patching ;).
>>
>> Auke
>
> You should read the thread "Abysmal Performance" of these mailing list
> from last month. They had a similar problem and downgraded to a 2.6.38
Hello,
I am getting following errors in the syslog
(running 2.6.39-gentoo kernel, latest git btrfs-progs,
mounted with -o space_cache)
btrfs: free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
generation (325850) for block group 29360128
btrfs: free space inode generation (0) did n
Hello again,
OK I found it (randomly) on the wiki:
btrfs filesystem resize 3:max /home
Seems like btrfs help is not up-to-date and the wiki is...
Thank you again
Lubos
Lubos Kolouch, Wed, 04 May 2011 08:31:30 +:
> Hello,
>
> I added a new disk into our RAID5 array, it looks
Hello,
I added a new disk into our RAID5 array, it looks like this:
md2 : active raid5 sdd4[3] sde4[4] sda4[0] sdc4[2] sdb4[1]
3767274240 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [U]
# btrfs fi sh
Label: none uuid: 5534d2e7-be31-49c7-8ab7-90c5ab8afe18
Total devices 1 FS by
Hello,
Say I have a btrfs-formatted disk with many subvolumes/snapshots.
How do I do backup (over network) ?
If I use just rsync, I will get many copies of the files (one for each
snapshot).
So I would need to write a tool that would
- get listing of the subvolumes/snapshots
- somehow figure o
Goffredo Baroncelli, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:24:57 +0100:
> On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
>>
>>> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>>>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:2
Chris Samuel, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:09:17 +1100:
> On 10/02/11 07:12, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>
>> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0
>
> My memory of the strace showed that there was no /dev/root when it tried
> to open it - can you confirm whether or not t
Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
>>
>>> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I&#
Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
>> loop, encryption etc.
>>
>> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5
>&g
Hi,
I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
loop, encryption etc.
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
error checking /dev/sda5 mount status
Is there something I ca
Goffredo Baroncelli, Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:02:11 +0100:
> On 01/23/2011 04:05 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:17:13 +0100:
>>
>>> Hi Lubos,
>>>
>>> On 01/23/2011 08:17 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>>>> Hello
Goffredo Baroncelli, Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:17:13 +0100:
> Hi Lubos,
>
> On 01/23/2011 08:17 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> During doing backups I found strange behaviour... 2.6.37, latest btrfs-
>> progs from git
>>
>> nbgentoo ~
Hello,
During doing backups I found strange behaviour... 2.6.37, latest btrfs-
progs from git
nbgentoo ~ # btrfs subv crea a
Create subvolume './a'
nbgentoo ~ # cd a
nbgentoo a # btrfs subv crea b
Create subvolume './b'
nbgentoo a # touch b/file
nbgentoo a # ls -l b/
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root roo
Lubos Kolouch, Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:50:41 +:
> Hello,
>
> After another power loss (I am fortune, am I not?) I have the following
> situation :
>
> Label: none uuid: ac155851-0e31-4aed-9ba4-ee712506368a
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1.02TB
> devid
Hello,
After another power loss (I am fortune, am I not?) I have the following
situation :
Label: none uuid: ac155851-0e31-4aed-9ba4-ee712506368a
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1.02TB
devid1 size 931.51GB used 70.00GB path /dev/sdd1
devid3 size 1.79TB used 66.52GB
Tomasz Chmielewski, Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:07:58 +0200:
> On 05.10.2010 17:33, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> On 10/5/2010 7:26 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> There is a standard df tool, but it can be a lengthy process for
>>> filesystems with lots of files.
>>
>> Maybe you mean du? df takes almost no t
Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen, Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:48:56 +0200:
> Hey guys,
>
> Today I experienced my first checksum error just out of the blue - and
> it's not just the 'csum + 1 = private' issue, it's a completely
> different one. Because of this, I am unable to retrieve the data off the
> drive, ev
Martin Walter, Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:46:05 +0200:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Francis Galiegue wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:00, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> [...]
>> >
>> > Something like SurveyMonkey (http://www.surveymonkey.com) or
>> > SurveyGizmo (http://www.surveygizmo.com) o
Goffredo Baroncelli, Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:08:50 +0200:
> On Friday, 24 September, 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen, Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:37:02 +0200:
>>
>> > On 24 September 2010 07:41, Lubos Kolouch
>> > wrote:
>> >> H
Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen, Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:37:02 +0200:
> On 24 September 2010 07:41, Lubos Kolouch
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I added disk to raid5 array on one of the backup hosts, running btrfs.
>>
>> So on /dev/md2 I have plenty of space now.
&
Hello,
I added disk to raid5 array on one of the backup hosts, running btrfs.
So on /dev/md2 I have plenty of space now.
However when I run
btrfs filesystem resize max /dev/md2
I get
Resize '/dev/md2' of 'max'
ERROR: unable to resize '/dev/md2'
The same result when I try resize +1g.
strac
Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +0000, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> >> No, n
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +0000, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> No, not stable!
>>
>> Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems.
>
> Please tell me more about your system. I do extensiv
from this type of failures,
speaking about stability is a joke
Lubos Kolouch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Lubos Kolouch, Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:55:12 +:
> Hello,
>
> I have on one computer damaged btrfs filesystem... it was a strange
> crash, it showed about 30% free space, however then the volume crashed
> with 'no space left' messages and after reboot it is unusable.
>
Hello,
I have on one computer damaged btrfs filesystem... it was a strange
crash, it showed about 30% free space, however then the volume crashed
with 'no space left' messages and after reboot it is unusable.
I can mount it, I can df it but when I try for example ls,
ls gets stuck (does not displ
Johannes Hirte, Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:38:30 +0200:
> On Thursday 26 August 2010 15:39:25 Andreas Philipp wrote:
>> On 26.08.2010 15:27, Johannes Hirte wrote:
>> > Looks like another manifestation of the csum bug. Are you able to
>> > read all files from the affected volume? Did you tried a balance w
Lubos
Lubos Kolouch, Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:09:59 +:
> correction - btrfs-cache processes
>
> Lubos Kolouch, Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:02:18 +:
>
>> With 2.6.34 it basically "works", but time to time the load goes up to
>> 50 and lot of btrfs-cleaner proce
correction - btrfs-cache processes
Lubos Kolouch, Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:02:18 +:
> With 2.6.34 it basically "works", but time to time the load goes up to
> 50 and lot of btrfs-cleaner processess are spawned... the system is
> responsive though, except for the filesystem...
30, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> wrote:
>> I use the latest btrfs-tools and 2.6.34-020634-generic kernel for
>> lucid. Got no issues like that, is it happening with 2.6.34 kernel as
>> well?
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Lubos Kolouch
>&g
Yes, I pulled today's btrfs-progs.
Lubos
On Pá, čec 30, 2010, 13:03:10, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Have you updated with latest btrfs-tools?
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > kerner 2.6.35-rc6
> >
>
Hello,
kerner 2.6.35-rc6
btrfs filesystem df /home
Data: total=1.68TB, used=987.62GB
Metadata: total=56.01GB, used=48.16GB
System: total=12.00MB, used=200.00KB
touch: cannot touch `/home/x': No space left on device
Any ideas what I should do?
Thank you
Lubos
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Hello,
during my testing of btrfs I found out,
that deletion of directory with many files (many millions) takes vry
long (it is running two weeks now and did not finish).
But when instead of directory I create subvolume, it is deleted instantly.
Is it normal behaviour? (gentoo 2.6.34-r1, b
Hello,
I added another device to the / filesystem
(btrfs device add).
Now I can't boot off it, even though kernel sees both devices
(sda2, sdb2).
Am I screwed or is there any way how to convince the kernel
to assemble the / filesystem?
Thank you
Lubos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
Oystein Viggen, Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:15:03 +0200:
> For btrfs with lots of snapshots, I believe "btrfs device add" of the
> new device followed by "btrfs device remove" of the old one would be the
> most convenient.
>
> Øystein
This solution if very elegant and cool - if you can put the discs int
Daniel J Blueman, Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:26:10 +0100:
>> What is the correct way to do this?
>
> The only way to do this preserving duplication is to use hardlinks
> between duplicated files (which reference counts the inode), and use
> 'rsync -H'.
>
> Dan
But when the files are on different snapho
43 matches
Mail list logo
