Re: lvm volume like support

2013-03-01 Thread Marcus Sorensen
That's great, but the issue is that usually the block device version performs better than just creating a file and using it as a raw image or loop device. Creating a file, then running it through a SCSI target seems like it's going in the opposite direction. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Alex

Re: Low volume list ?

2011-09-01 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Aren't the subjects like [PATCH and [GIT specifically so people can filter the messages how they see fit? On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Swâmi Petaramesh sw...@petaramesh.org wrote: Hi list, Could it be considered to create a low-volume, user-oriented mailing-list that wouldn't spit an email

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1693!

2011-07-28 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I too have run into this just today, file system is nearly fresh: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1693! invalid opcode: [#9] SMP CPU 21 Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack

Re: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2204

2011-07-28 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Ahh , this was the kernel warning you mentioned over at ceph. I just ran into it as well, with a fresh ceph system, all storage nodes are doing it (must be the cool thing), seems to have led to (or coincidentally followed by) the kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1693! emailed about.