Hi,
On 14/01/15 01:13, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:20:19PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> This reverts commit c2691f807ddd2c6b261c5707f6838a45d9275390 as it breaks
>> backtracing on actual glibc environments.
>
> This is to support musl libc. If it does not work then the test i
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Josef Bacik wrote:
This only works if you include features.h and I don't know if other libcs
provide that. Thanks,
musl provides /usr/include/features.h and glibc does so as well. (Checked
on musl and glibc systems) Searching the web seems to suggest that uclibc
sup
Hi,
On 14/01/15 01:42, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:31:34AM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
>>> This only works if you include features.h and I don't know if other libcs
>>> provide that. Thanks,
>>
>> musl provides /usr/include/features
metimes trivial patches can still be wrong. :-)
Regards,
Merlijn
From 66bec5ce01f650839b3cbd88ac40594daaab0299 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Merlijn Wajer
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:13:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Restore backtrace functionality on glibc.
Originally
rlijn
From da43021732fab3f70c75f155bded8e5f35fdffe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Merlijn Wajer
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:07:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Include headers required for musl-libc.
This fixes various compilation errors where PATH_MAX and XATTR_SIZE_MAX
were missing. To my knowledge, this should have no bad si
Hi,
On 17/12/14 17:49, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 03:35:09PM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> Attached are the two patches generated with git format-patch. I am aware
>> that this may not be required format for submitting patches -- but
>>
