On 09/15/2017 03:07 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> [...]
> Case #1
> 2x 7200 rpm HDD -> md raid 1 -> host BTRFS rootfs -> qemu cow2 storage
> -> guest BTRFS filesystem
> SQL table row insertions per second: 1-2
>
> Case #2
> 2x 7200 rpm HDD -> md raid 1 -> host BTRFS rootfs -> qemu raw storage ->
>
On 09/14/2017 07:48 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 14 September 2017 at 16:24, Kai Krakow wrote:
> [..]
>> > Getting e.g. boot files into read order or at least nearby improves
>> > boot time a lot. Similar for loading applications.
> [...]
> Just please some example which I
On 08/31/2017 01:18 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> [...]
>> Any hint here?
> Having compression enabled causes no issues with defray and balance.
> There appears to be a prevalent belief however that defrag is
> pointless if you're using compression, probably because some versions
> of
Hello group.
I am confused: Can somebody please confirm/deny, which RAID subsystem is
affected? BTRFS' RAID5/6 or mdadm (Linux kernel raid) RAID 5/6 ?
Are there some gotchas (in terms of broken reliability) when using
kernel one?
The web is full of legends, it seems that this confusion is quite