Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] Documentation: add a new file documenting multigrain timestamps

2024-07-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
ilesystems/multigrain-ts.rst | 120 > > 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap Thanks. -- ~Randy

Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] Documentation: add a new file documenting multigrain timestamps

2024-07-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/8/24 8:53 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > Add a high-level document that describes how multigrain timestamps work, > rationale for them, and some info about implementation and tradeoffs. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > --- > Documentation/filesystems/multigrain-ts.rst | 120 >

Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] Documentation: add a new file documenting multigrain timestamps

2024-07-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/5/24 10:02 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > Add a high-level document that describes how multigrain timestamps work, > rationale for them, and some info about implementation and tradeoffs. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > --- > Documentation/filesystems/multigrain-ts.rst | 120 > +++

[PATCH] btrfs: ref-verify: use 'inline void' keyword ordering

2021-02-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
ce(struct ref_action *ra) ../fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:225:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration] static void inline __print_stack_trace(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool") Signed-off-by: Ran

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 5 (btrfs/zstd)

2019-02-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 2/4/19 10:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190204: > on i386: ../fs/btrfs/zstd.c: In function ‘zstd_reclaim_timer_fn’: ../fs/btrfs/zstd.c:27:35: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow] #define ZSTD_BTRFS_RECLAIM_NS (45 * NSEC_PER_SEC)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: hoist BTRFS_IOC_[SG]ET_FSLABEL to vfs

2018-05-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/09/2018 09:01 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Move the btrfs label ioctls up to the vfs for general use. > > This retains 256 chars as the maximum size through the interface, which > is the btrfs limit and AFAIK exceeds any other filesystem's maximum > label size. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen

Re: [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max()

2018-03-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/09/2018 04:07 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:05:36 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > >> When max() is used in stack array size calculations from literal values >> (e.g. "char foo[max(sizeof(struct1), sizeof(struct2))]", the compiler >> thinks this is a dynamic calculation due to th

Re: Storing errors in the XArray

2017-12-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 12/15/2017 09:10 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:10:22PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> +The XArray does not support storing :c:func:`IS_ERR` pointers; some >>> +conflict with data values and others conflict with entries the XArray >>> +uses

Re: Naming of tag operations in the XArray

2017-12-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 12/15/2017 04:34 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:22:14PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:10:22PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> +A freshly-initialised XArray contains a ``NULL`` pointer at every index. >>>> +Eac

Re: [PATCH v4 08/73] xarray: Add documentation

2017-12-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 12/05/2017 04:40 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > This is documentation on how to use the XArray, not details about its > internal implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox > --- > Documentation/core-api/index.rst | 1 + > Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst | 2

Re: Something like ZFS Channel Programs for BTRFS & probably XFS or even VFS?

2017-10-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/03/17 13:10, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:19:18PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: >> [repost. I didn´t notice autocompletion gave me wrong address for fsdevel, >> blacklisted now] >> >> Hello. >> >> What do you think of >> >> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Projects/ZFS_Channel

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

2017-04-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20170406: >> > > on i386: > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! > > Reported-by: Randy Du

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

2017-04-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170406: > on i386: ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! Reported-by: Randy Dunlap -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (btrfs)

2016-04-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/29/16 00:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160428: > on i386: fs/built-in.o: In function `scrub_raid56_parity': scrub.c:(.text+0x2d06fb): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in th

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: add __print_symbolic_u64 to avoid warnings on 32bit machine

2011-05-25 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/25/11 09:47, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 09:12 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >>> But what I sent out previously is not going into 2.6.40 anyway. Ingo >>> feels that it's too late in the merge window to pull those changes and >>>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: add __print_symbolic_u64 to avoid warnings on 32bit machine

2011-05-25 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:27:44 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 01:49 -0400, liubo wrote: > > On 05/01/2011 11:35 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 18:01 +0800, liubo wrote: > > >> ping? > > > > > > Sorry, I've been trying to get the new ftrace function tracer

Re: [PATCH] Trace: add __print_symbolic_u64 to avoid warnings on 32bit machine

2011-04-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:18:46 +0800 liubo wrote: > > Btrfs has some "ULL" macros, and when these macros are passed to tracepoints' > __print_symbolic(), there will be 64->32 truncate WARNINGS during compiling > on 32bit box. Hi, Can this also be used to stop this warning that has been around lik

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Correct printing of sector_t

2010-11-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
ned > int’, but argument 4 has type ‘sector_t’ > > Hence always cast it to `unsigned long long' for printing. > > Introduced by commit e65e1535542931e51189832264cd282e5899e4b9 ("btrfs: fix > panic caused by direct IO") > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterh

Re: [PATCH V3 1/8] Cleancache: Documentation

2010-06-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:18:39 -0700 Dan Magenheimer wrote: > [PATCH V3 1/8] Cleancache: Documentation > > Add cleancache documentation to Documentation/vm and > sysfs ABI documentation to Documentation/ABI > > Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer > > Diffstat: > ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-cleancach

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/Changes: add required versions for new filesystems

2009-01-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: >>> btrfs requires version 0.18 of its tools, and squashfs requires >>> 4.0. >> This time, with a typo fix. > > While you're at it, could you also update e2fsprogs