On 3 Jan 2013, at 12:26, Richard Cooper wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to repair a broken fs using btrfsck and am hitting a failed
> assertion. I'd appreciate any suggestions for what to do next. Is there any
> thing I can do to help fix this bug? Any other inf
Hi All,
I have has a machine doesn't get on with btrfs at all. I've been using it as a
testbed for several months and it never seems to last more than a couple of
weeks before FS corruption.
My versions are:
- OS - CentOS 6.3
- Kernel - 3.7.1-2 from http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
- btrfs-pro
On 3 Jan 2013, at 16:43, Richard Cooper wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 15:06, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:26:38AM -0700, Richard Cooper wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to repair a broken fs using btrfsck and am hitting
On 3 Jan 2013, at 15:06, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:26:38AM -0700, Richard Cooper wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm trying to repair a broken fs using btrfsck and am hitting a failed
>> assertion. I'd appreciate any suggestions for what to do
Hi All,
I'm trying to repair a broken fs using btrfsck and am hitting a failed
assertion. I'd appreciate any suggestions for what to do next. Is there any
thing I can do to help fix this bug? Any other information from my FS which
would help? If the FS could be salvaged that would be a bonus, b
On 29 Jun 2012, at 11:42, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> What should I do now? Do I need to upgrade to a more recent btrfs?
>
> Yep
>
>> If so, how?
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/entry/oracle_unbreakable_enterprise_kernel_release
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
Perfect, thank you! I was lo
Hi All,
I have two machines where I've been testing various btrfs based backup
strategies. They are both Cent OS 6 with the standard kernel and btrfs-progs
RPMs from the CentOS repos.
- kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64
- btrfs-progs-0.19-12.el6.x86_64
Both are currently in a state when trying
