On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:54 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> > There's been a parallel effort to incorporate a general set of lz4
> > patches in the kernel.
> >
> > I see these patches are currently queued up in the linux-next tree, so
>
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Mitch Harder
wrote:
> There's been a parallel effort to incorporate a general set of lz4
> patches in the kernel.
>
> I see these patches are currently queued up in the linux-next tree, so
> we may see them in the 3.11 kernel.
>
> It looks like lz4 and lz4hc will
First off, thanks for an awesome file system, it is working well for
my purposes of compressing a filesystem on a small VPS. Woot!
I thought I'd call out a few things (in the hopes of spurring
improvements) I'd seen about btrfs (in case they weren't common
knowledge...):
http://linux.slashdot.o
Any update on the "unmerged" lz4 patches? Have they been merged?
Just wondering (and +1'ing my support, obviously).
Thank you.
-roger-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.
Looks like this message was initially viewed as spam because of an
HTML subpart...trying it again...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roger Pack
Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:25 PM
Subject: +1 for xz
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
I see from
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org
