Christie
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke
> ---
Looks good with regard to nilfs2.
Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi
> drivers/md/bitmap.c | 4 ++--
> fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 24 ++--
> fs/btrfs/check-integrity.h |
s Reinecke
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c | 18 ++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi
Thanks,
Ryuske Konishi
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c b/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> index 7666f1d..7b13e14 100644
>
On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:02:51 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2015 01:31:43 +0900 (JST) Ryusuke Konishi
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 10:16:23 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> > The "fh_len" passed to ->fh_to_* is not guaranteed to be that same as
>
!= FILEID_NILFS_WITH_PARENT ||
fh_len < NILFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE) &&
(fh_type != FILEID_NILFS_WITHOUT_PARENT ||
fh_len < NILFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTABLE))
return NULL;
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static struct dentry
here are some earlier results:
>
>http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-21/bonnie.html
>
> Bonnie++ couldn't complete on nilfs2, only the generic tests
> and tiobench were run.
I looked at the log but couldn't identify the error.
Is that a disk full?
Thanks,
Ryu
2009/1/6 Chris Mason :
> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:37 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 02:29:17AM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> > 2009/1/6 Chris Mason :
>> > > On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 17:56 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> > >&
2009/1/6 Chris Mason :
> On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 17:56 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I've started to read and try btrfs, and soon met the following build
>> errors. The attached patch fixes the problem.
>>
>> Could you check this?
>
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:14:56 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 18:44 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:38:07 -0500, Chris Mason
> >
> > Btrfs seems to have other helpful code including pages/bio compression
> > which may become
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:38:07 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 01:37 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > In addition, there seem to be well-separated reusable routines such as
> > async-thread (enhanced workqueue) and extent_map. Do you intend to
> > move
portunity to clean
up these violations.
With regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Chris,
I've started to read and try btrfs, and soon met the following build
errors. The attached patch fixes the problem.
Could you check this?
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
Btrfs: fix build errors of extent_io.c
This will fix the following compile-time errors:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: A
11 matches
Mail list logo