Re: Phoronix article slaming BTRFS

2009-06-23 Thread Wil Reichert
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Mike Ramsey wrote: > Jaime sanchez gmail.com> writes: > >> >> They are using 2.6.29.4 kernel, it isn't a bit old?? >> >>  I think that kernel doesn't have the last btrfs updates, and that it >>  is a very bad work and benchmarks results from phoronix part. If u are

Re: lots of kernel threads

2009-02-25 Thread Wil Reichert
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 20:09 -0800, Wil Reichert wrote: >> I'm a Gentoo user and figured mounting /usr/portage & /var/portage >> (distfiles, packages, persistent stuff normally in /usr/portage) and >> /tmp moiunted

lots of kernel threads

2009-02-24 Thread Wil Reichert
I'm a Gentoo user and figured mounting /usr/portage & /var/portage (distfiles, packages, persistent stuff normally in /usr/portage) and /tmp moiunted as btrfs. I figured it would be a decent test & its nothing I cann't replace readily. After about 6 hours of uptime and a couple package merges, I