Re: btrfs fsck doesn't modify a thing, and btrfs can not balance any data on a new device

2010/1/27 Yan, Zheng : > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:12 PM, briaeros007 wrote: >> 2010/1/27 Josef Bacik : >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:16:42PM +0100, briaeros007 wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have a btrfs volume on a two 1TB disk, and i&#x

Re: btrfs fsck doesn't modify a thing, and btrfs can not balance any data on a new device

2010/1/27 Josef Bacik : > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:16:42PM +0100, briaeros007 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a btrfs volume on a two 1TB disk, and i've been trying to add a >> new (1.5 TB) to this volume. I've done btrfsctl -a /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs >> wi

btrfs fsck doesn't modify a thing, and btrfs can not balance any data on a new device

Hello, I have a btrfs volume on a two 1TB disk, and i've been trying to add a new (1.5 TB) to this volume. I've done btrfsctl -a /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs without trouble, and btrfs-show see the third disk. But I've got segfault when I try to balance the data. And when a try a fsck, he do absolutely not

Re: (Little) Patch about null dereference with acl and posix.

2009/12/11 Johannes Hirte : > Am Mittwoch 18 November 2009 22:28:27 schrieb briaeros007: >> Hello, >> For some days, i've got oops on my system and i've investigate it a bit. >> The trouble was with  "posix_acl_equiv_mode" , and for some reason >>

(Little) Patch about null dereference with acl and posix.

Hello, For some days, i've got oops on my system and i've investigate it a bit. The trouble was with "posix_acl_equiv_mode" , and for some reason (corrupted metadata ?) btrfs sometimes call it with "acl"==NULL This function doesn't like it. So in my patch I've first put a little error protection a