[PATCH 1/1] btrfs-progs: build system - do not use AC_DEFINE twice

2021-03-20 Thread pierre . labastie
From: Pierre Labastie Autoheader uses the AC_DEFINE macros (and a few others) to populate the config.h.in file. The autotools documentation does not tell what happens if AC_DEFINE is used twice for the same identifier. This patch prevents using AC_DEFINE twice for HAVE_OWN_FIEMAP_EXTENT_DEFINE

[PATCH 0/1] btrfs-progs: build system - do not use AC_DEFINE twice

2021-03-20 Thread pierre . labastie
From: Pierre Labastie Autoheader uses the AC_DEFINE macros (and a few others) to populate the config.h.in file. The autotools documentation does not tell what happens if AC_DEFINE is used twice for the same identifier. This patch prevents using AC_DEFINE twice for HAVE_OWN_FIEMAP_EXTENT_DEFINE

Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: build system: Fix the test for EXT4_EPOCH_MASK

2021-03-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 15:53 +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 07:49:13PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > After sending the first version of the patch, I realized that it > > was flawed, because of some formatting by the MUA. It took me > > some time to

[PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: build system: Fix the test for EXT4_EPOCH_MASK

2021-03-14 Thread Pierre Labastie
est shouldn't be run in that case? Issue: #353 Signed-off-by: Pierre Labastie --- configure.ac | 8 convert/source-ext2.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 612a3f87..dd6a5de7 100644 --- a/configure.

Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix the test for EXT4_EPOCH_MASK

2021-03-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
un in that case? Issue: #353 Signed-off-by: Pierre Labastie --- configure.ac | 8 convert/source-ext2.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 612a3f87..dd6a5de7 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -2