Hello, would somebody please write down how to create deb kernel package
with latest btrfs from the git tree -- that would be a big help.
thanks,
rk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majo
http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives
jim owens wrote:
> Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:53:50PM -0500, jim owens wrote:
>>> +/* traditional 512-byte device sector alignment is the
>>> + * minimum required. if they ha
.. it would be great if btrfs could be expended about abilities that
OneFS file system has (FS by Isilon)
.. there is ceph open source clustered/distributed storage system that
is using btrfs, maybe work with those people would be a good start
http://ceph.newdream.net/about/
http://ceph.newdream.ne
.. it would be good to have some "mechanism" that will "prevent" people
mixing -d with -D
Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:35:33PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this is a follow-up of the previous email. I rewrite the btrfs command in C.
>> Now the followi
.com/FoundationsTeam/BtrfsSupport
cheers,
rk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> it is, and reading -> "df is lying. The total bytes in the FS include all 4
> drives. I need to fix up the math for the total available
> space.", it looks like its under control. thx!
I think so too -- I have six 1TB drives on RAID-10 btrfs and it shows
that I have 5.5TB free space .. how
.. btrfs-vol -r missing /mnt/btrfs will end with segmentation fault due to
this kernel BUG
(this box runs ubuntu server 10.02 Alpha 2 and the btrfs-tools package is from
the ubuntu depository)
# btrfs-show
failed to read /dev/sdf
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: btrfs_label_01 uuid: acc4b180-4
.. I have the same puzzlement?
0bo0 wrote:
> I created a btrfs RAID-10 array across 4-drives,
>
> mkfs.btrfs -L TEST -m raid10 -d raid10 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
> btrfs-show
> Label: TEST uuid: 2ac85206-2d88-47d7-a1e7-a93d80b199f8
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used
try this article "Linux Don't Need No Stinkin' ZFS: BTRFS Intro &
Benchmarks"
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7308/3/
, there is a benchmark table and speed analysis (very informative), but
all the benchmarks are done with same -m and -d mkfs.btrfs option
mail ignored wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just getting st
