Hi Arne, I will start with 3.6 then try to bisect it as you suggest.
However I am currently tied with some high priority work, will get to
this after it.
--Shyam
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 02/15/13 05:34, shyam btrfs wrote:
Hi Arne,
Yes
the filesystem
mountable again?
Thanks,
Arne
On 12.02.2013 08:31, shyam btrfs wrote:
Also immediately after this problem, its impossible to mount the
filesystem. it consistently fails with
[ 2092.254428] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at 03c4
[ 2092.255945] IP
see things
strange in slabinfo, but perhaps you may see it. In several runs I hit
out-of-memory killer trying to kill processes, in this trace btrfs
itself suffered with allocation.
--Shyam
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 12.02.2013 08:31, shyam btrfs wrote
, 2013 at 12:55 PM, shyam btrfs shyam.bt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arne, Jan,
I am using btrfs directly from Linux 3.8rc5 (commit
949db153b6466c6f7cad5a427ecea94985927311). I am trying to use qgroups
functionality with a basic random-write workload, it constantly
keeps leaking memory within few
Hi Alex, Jan,
I was also interested in send/receive semantics was thinking that if
we adhere to the semantics as in
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg07482.html
of:
it is impossible to track the deleted items (files,dirs, eXtended
attributes). I can develop a command
