Tested-by: Wang Yanfeng
On 06/26/2015 12:35 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:03:57PM +0800, wangyf wrote:
I confirmed this bug report, and found the reason is that
I compiled the patched module with a dirty kernel.
This morning I tested this patch again, and didn&#
No problem.
Wang Yanfeng
cheers
wangyf
在 2015年06月26日 00:35, Omar Sandoval 写道:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:03:57PM +0800, wangyf wrote:
I confirmed this bug report, and found the reason is that
I compiled the patched module with a dirty kernel.
This morning I tested this patch again, and
ne 24, 2015 12:15:29 AM EDT, Omar Sandoval wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:07:00AM +0800, wangyf wrote:
Hi,
I have tested your PATCH v2 , but something wrong happened.
kernel: 4.1.0-rc7+ with your five patches
vitrualBox ubuntu14.10-server + LVM
I make a new btrfs.ko with your patches,
rmmod ori
Hi,
I have tested your PATCH v2 , but something wrong happened.
kernel: 4.1.0-rc7+ with your five patches
vitrualBox ubuntu14.10-server + LVM
I make a new btrfs.ko with your patches,
rmmod original module and insmod the new.
When I use the profile RAID1/10, mkfs successfully
But when mount the
Hi. I have tested this patchset in Virtual Machine.
Environment:
Oracle VirtualBox 4.3.10 + Ubuntu 14.10 server + LVM 2.02.98
Kernel:
4.1.0-rc7 (12 June, 2015 / Today) with your 4 patches.
Btrfs-progs: 4.0
Generic Test Procedure:
mkfs.btrfs -f -m $RAID -d $RAID && mount
