Re: possible circular locking dependency detected (sb_internal/fs_reclaim)

2019-09-11 Thread Zdenek Sojka
Hello, -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Nikolay Borisov Komu: Zdenek Sojka , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Datum: 11. 9. 2019 10:16:49 Předmět: Re: possible circular locking dependency detected (sb_internal/fs_reclaim) On 11.09.19 г. 10:54 ч., Zdenek Sojka wrote: > He

Re: possible circular locking dependency detected (sb_internal/fs_reclaim)

2019-09-11 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 11.09.19 г. 10:54 ч., Zdenek Sojka wrote: > Hello, > > this is my fourth attempt to post this message to the mailing list; this > time, without any attached kernel config (because it has over 100KiB). I also > tried contacting the kernel btrfs maintainers directly by email, but they > p

possible circular locking dependency detected (sb_internal/fs_reclaim)

2019-09-11 Thread Zdenek Sojka
t -O2 (gcc-8.3.0). Please let me know if I can provide any more information. Best regards, Zdenek Sojka The dmesg warning I recently triggered: [30560.303721] == [30560.303722] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30560.3037

btrfs/011 possible circular locking dependency detected

2018-10-03 Thread Anand Jain
] == [ 233.710303] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 233.710574] 4.17.0+ #4 Not tainted [ 233.710757] -- [ 233.711006] kswapd0/749 is trying to acquire lock: [ 233.711244] e4661f1f (&delayed_node->mutex){+.

4.14.35: possible circular locking dependency detected

2018-04-23 Thread Petr Janecek
Hi, after scrub start, scrub cancel, umount, mount of a two disk raid1 (data + metadata): [12999.229791] == [12999.236029] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12999.242261] 4.14.35 #36 Not tainted [12999.245806

Re: 4.15.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc28.x86_64: possible circular locking dependency detected

2017-12-15 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
trfs issue: > > > > [ 94.192907] ====== > > [ 94.192911] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > > [ 94.192917] 4.15.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc28.x86_64 #1 Not tainted > > I'm not seeing it so far with 4.15.0-0.rc

Re: 4.15.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc28.x86_64: possible circular locking dependency detected

2017-12-11 Thread Chris Murphy
94.192911] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > [ 94.192917] 4.15.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc28.x86_64 #1 Not tainted I'm not seeing it so far with 4.15.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc28.x86_64+debug. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin

4.15.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc28.x86_64: possible circular locking dependency detected

2017-12-11 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
Hi, Jut done upgrade on my laptop to the latest Fedora rawhide packages. After reboot and login in dmesg I found logged btrfs issue: [ 94.192907] == [ 94.192911] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 94.192917] 4.15.0-0

[4.14.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc28.x86_64]: possible circular locking dependency detected

2017-09-30 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
Raw oops dump: [ 173.695170] == [ 173.695175] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 173.695181] 4.14.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc28.x86_64 #1 Tainted: G OE [ 173.695186

Re: [BUG] btrfs dev del causes 'possible circular locking dependency detected'

2012-08-28 Thread Miao Xie
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:44:12 +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:01:57 +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:36:54PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: >>> Aug 9 16:02:21 qvarne kernel: [ 543.479460] -> #2 >>> (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+...}: >>> Aug 9 16:02:21 q

Re: [BUG] btrfs dev del causes 'possible circular locking dependency detected'

2012-08-09 Thread Stefan Behrens
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:01:57 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:36:54PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: >> Aug 9 16:02:21 qvarne kernel: [ 543.479460] -> #2 >> (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+...}: >> Aug 9 16:02:21 qvarne kernel: [ 543.541341][] >> lock_acquire+0x95/0x1

Re: [BUG] btrfs dev del causes 'possible circular locking dependency detected'

2012-08-09 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:36:54PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: > Aug 9 16:02:21 qvarne kernel: [ 543.479460] -> #2 > (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+...}: > Aug 9 16:02:21 qvarne kernel: [ 543.541341][] > lock_acquire+0x95/0x150 > Aug 9 16:02:21 qvarne kernel: [ 543.612269][]

[BUG] btrfs dev del causes 'possible circular locking dependency detected'

2012-08-09 Thread Stefan Behrens
d /mnt2; tar xf -) 2>/dev/null echo fails with ENOSPC after some seconds umount /mnt2 mount /dev/sdo /mnt2 btrfs dev add /dev/sdq /mnt2 btrfs dev del /dev/sdp /mnt2 echo causes the 'INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected' echo fails with 'ERROR: error removing the dev

Re: "possible circular locking dependency detected"

2008-11-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote: > I got this lockdep warning while running tiobench on a clean btrfs filesystem > with the latest code available (commit > 2c41b36dd2f9fb5dee150f20c84895496e0642f2) > But it was a purely read-only workload: only root could write to the

"possible circular locking dependency detected"

2008-11-20 Thread Diego Calleja
"denied permission" errors. [ 5177.201587] === [ 5177.201594] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 5177.201601] 2.6.28-rc5-dirty #7 [ 5177.201604] --- [ 5177.201