On Fr 27.Aug'10 at 17:38:01 +0800, liubo wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 05:53 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just got this BUG: message in dmesg which I think is btrfs related.
> >
> [...]
>
> > [ 148.152107] Call Trace:
> > [ 148.152113] [] ? process_timeout+0x0/0x10
> > [ 148.152
On 08/26/2010 05:53 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just got this BUG: message in dmesg which I think is btrfs related.
>
[...]
> [ 148.152107] Call Trace:
> [ 148.152113] [] ? process_timeout+0x0/0x10
> [ 148.152118] [] end_workqueue_fn+0x10d/0x130
> [ 148.152122] [] worker_lo
On Do 26.Aug'10 at 7:53:36 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:53:57AM +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just got this BUG: message in dmesg which I think is btrfs related.
> >
> > I have a btrfs filesystem in a memory card which I use to contain the
> > cach
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:53:57AM +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just got this BUG: message in dmesg which I think is btrfs related.
>
> I have a btrfs filesystem in a memory card which I use to contain the
> cache and config of chromium (to avoid writing to much in the SSD):
>
>
Hi,
I've just got this BUG: message in dmesg which I think is btrfs related.
I have a btrfs filesystem in a memory card which I use to contain the
cache and config of chromium (to avoid writing to much in the SSD):
/dev/mmcblk0p1 on /home/mafra/mmc type btrfs
(rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,noatime,no
