Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-29 Thread Chris Mason
; To: Chris Mason; btrfs > > Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error > > > > Chris Mason wrote on 2015/07/23 21:57 -0400: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:29:05AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > > > > [ deadlock with the 070 patches ] >

RE: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-29 Thread Zhao Lei
Hi, Chris > -Original Message- > From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Qu Wenruo > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:11 PM > To: Chris Mason; btrfs > Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error > &

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-28 Thread Qu Wenruo
Chris Mason wrote on 2015/07/23 21:57 -0400: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:29:05AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: [ deadlock with the 070 patches ] Thanks Chris We will investigate it with highest priority. Thanks, Qu Thanks! I'm doing a few more runs to make sure the lockup is new with these patc

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-23 Thread Qu Wenruo
Chris Mason wrote on 2015/07/23 21:57 -0400: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:29:05AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: [ deadlock with the 070 patches ] Thanks Chris We will investigate it with highest priority. Thanks, Qu Thanks! I'm doing a few more runs to make sure the lockup is new with these pa

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-23 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:29:05AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: [ deadlock with the 070 patches ] > Thanks Chris > > We will investigate it with highest priority. > > Thanks, > Qu > Thanks! I'm doing a few more runs to make sure the lockup is new with these patches. -chris -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-23 Thread Qu Wenruo
Thanks Chris We will investigate it with highest priority. Thanks, Qu Chris Mason wrote on 2015/07/23 16:21 -0400: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:28:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: Hi Chris, Is there anything wrong with it? It has been 2 weeks, and it's still not in your for linus branch. Is ther

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-23 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:28:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Is there anything wrong with it? > > It has been 2 weeks, and it's still not in your for linus branch. > > Is there anything wrong? I ran this through xfstests again, and got tasks deadlocked during btrfs/061. Looks lik

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-22 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:28:48PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Is there anything wrong with it? > > It has been 2 weeks, and it's still not in your for linus branch. > > Is there anything wrong? Nothing wrong at all, I've got it queued here. Thanks for the resend. -chris -- To uns

Re: [GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-22 Thread Qu Wenruo
Hi Chris, Is there anything wrong with it? It has been 2 weeks, and it's still not in your for linus branch. Is there anything wrong? Thanks, Qu Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/07/08 11:35 +0800: Hi Chris, Sorry for the late pull request, this one should be sent on Monday. :( This patchset is mean

[GIT PULL] Fix for btrfs/070 checksum error

2015-07-07 Thread Qu Wenruo
Hi Chris, Sorry for the late pull request, this one should be sent on Monday. :( This patchset is meant to fix an annoying bug triggered by btrfs/070 and some other concurrency scrub + IO load test. The bug itself is triggered by chance and took Zhao Lei quite a long time to trace and debug