Michael Witten posted on Tue, 01 Apr 2014 19:05:16 + as excerpted:
The `btrfs balance' completed successfully without error, and DID solve
my issues; it relocated every chunk, after which `btrfsck'
ran smoothly.
Thanks for the advice! You've put me at ease, and you've saved me a lot
of
I'd actually put more faith in the btrfs balance command...
Btrfs scrub is another alternative
I suppose, then, that my ultimate plan of action is thus:
* Back up important data.
* Give `btrfs scrub' a try.
* Give `btrfs balance' a try.
* Rebuild the file system if necessary.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:15:47 +0800, Shilong Wang wrote:
hello, recently, i was working on btrfsck repair. i post some
patches to make btrfsck to rebuild extent tree with snapshots.
you can pull code from david latest branch and have a try with
btrfsck --init-extent-tree.
Fortunately, the
Hello Michael,
On 04/02/2014 03:26 AM, Michael Witten wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:15:47 +0800, Shilong Wang wrote:
hello, recently, i was working on btrfsck repair. i post some
patches to make btrfsck to rebuild extent tree with snapshots.
you can pull code from david latest branch and have
Firstly, it should be noted that I can mount and use my Btrfs file
system with nary an error or warning; however, I'm uncomfortable
using it while it's in some kind of inconsistent state.
The `btrfsck' tool is telling me the following:
Errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
Michael Witten posted on Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:39:05 + as excerpted:
Firstly, it should be noted that I can mount and use my Btrfs file
system with nary an error or warning; however, I'm uncomfortable using
it while it's in some kind of inconsistent state.
The `btrfsck' tool is telling me
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:45:27 + (UTC), Duncan wrote:
Hopefully, none of those commands included btrfsck --repair
... Woops...
Fortunately, it doesn't seem to have changed anything.
That goes double if you're running raid5/6 mode
For the record, I've essentially just put Btrfs on 1 block
Michael Witten posted on Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:33:39 + as excerpted:
Just as an aside, I find it odd that the default for such a small system
would be to duplicate user data.
I've wondered at that logical accident too, but the problem was that
data chunks default to a gig in size and
Michael Witten posted on Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:33:39 + as excerpted:
I apologize if that ASCII art fails to render properly on your end.
FWIW I make a point of configuring monospace fonts as default for
internet message (Mail and news) bodies, precisely so I CAN properly view
ascii-art. So
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Duncan wrote:
FWIW I make a point of configuring monospace fonts as default for
internet message (Mail and news) bodies, precisely so I CAN properly view
ascii-art. So it came thru very nicely here. =:^)
That's good to know; unfortunately, you can never be
10 matches
Mail list logo
